Pay Per Call Advertising, Marketing & Affiliate Education.

Category: News (page 50 of 1505)

Online reviews: Which sites can you trust?

Everybody has an opinion about food, travel and the products they use. Online, there are plenty of places to express them.

Anyone with a smartphone, iPad or computer can write and post commentary on dozens of websites that accept unsolicited reviews of restaurants, travel, consumer products, home-repair services and many other buying categories.

Once reserved for stuffy, often anonymous critics at newspapers and magazines, such social commentary has become the avocation of millions of people. Their opinions have reshaped how businesses respond to customers, recast their marketing strategies and rewired how those looking for information find it before they buy.

For many businesses, such public scrutiny can be jarring at first. Some go on the defensive. But savvy operators use criticism as important customer feedback and an opportunity to improve.

For new businesses, reviewers add to the tension of a make-or-break situation. A positive write-up can bring new customers; a negative one can keep them away.

As the commentary culture has grown, all the opinions have influenced sales and spun off further business opportunities. They help online retailers such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com sell products to consumers, sight unseen. They also are the main attraction of review sites such as Citysearch, Yelp and TripAdvisor, which rate businesses according to the reviews and also sell them advertising and other business services.

All the openness, and all the dollars at stake, carry the potential for abuse.

Many review sites sell advertising and sponsorships to businesses that are reviewed on their sites, creating the possibility of unfair play.

Review site Yelp continues to be dogged by complaints from business owners and executives who believe they are being “blackmailed” into buying advertising.

And when anyone can post a comment, it’s possible to stack the deck with positive or negative reviews by authors with ulterior motives.

To prevent people from gaming the system, the websites employ sophisticated filters and computer programs to weed out bogus commentaries.

Influencing buyers

Anything with an address is fair game for so-called “Yelpers,” who review everything from restaurants to chiropractic clinics on the burgeoning online site Yelp .com.

Hotels, restaurants and tourist attractions are the target of reviews submitted to TripAdvisor, which is owned by travel-booking-site Expedia.

Angie’s List focuses on services providers, from doctors and dentists to roofers and house cleaners.

Other review sites include Zagat, Urban Spoon, Citysearch, Restaurant DB among countless others. Travel-booking sites, including Priceline and Yahoo Travel, also encourage travelers to post reviews.

Retailers’ market research shows that Internet shoppers increasingly rely on online reviews to make decisions and that those who browse a site’s top-rated products list were significantly more likely to make a purchase than those who didn’t. The review-readers also typically spent more per order.

Russell Dicker, director of community for Amazon.com, said that user-generated product reviews are a critical aspect of online retailers’ operations.

“They make the system work,” he said.

Product reviews helped Amazon sell more than $34 billion worth of goods via the Internet in 2010. Dicker said reviews ease online shoppers’ anxiety about buying products sight unseen and also help drive traffic to Amazon’s Web site. When people search for a product online, they often start by reading reviews which provide links to sellers.

Millions of voices

For review sites, the reviews are the main draw.

Anything with an address is fair game for so-called “Yelpers,” who critique everything from restaurants to chiropractic clinics on Yelp.com.

Hotels, restaurants and tourist attractions are the target of reviews submitted to TripAdvisor, which is owned by travel-booking-site Expedia. The estimated 45 million hotel and restaurant reviews posted on TripAdvisor draw 40 million visitors a month to its website. That traffic enabled the company to generate $480 million last year in advertising and booking revenue.

Angie’s List focuses on services providers, from doctors and dentists to roofers and house cleaners.

Other review sites include Zagat, Urban Spoon, Citysearch, Restaurant DB among countless others. Travel booking sites, including Priceline and Yahoo Travel, also encourage travelers to post reviews.

Yelp’s 17 million posted localized reviews of restaurants, retail stores and other businesses attracted 50 million visitors to its site last month, up from 46 million the month before.

Yelp is privately held and doesn’t release financials, but analysts at Up Next Research estimate the company took in $57 million in 2010 and is on target to pass $100 million by 2012.

Because of the growing importance of reviews, companies such as Amazon, Yelp and others go to great lengths to cultivate and nurture their colonies of reviewers.

Contributors can range from one-time authors eager to share a good or bad consumer experience to serial commentators such as Pennsylvania resident Harriett Klausner, who, at last count, has written 24,514 book and product reviews for Amazon.com.

While the companies typically don’t pay for reviews, top contributors at Amazon can be inducted into its exclusive Vine program and receive products from manufactures for their use and review. While Harriet Klausner is Amazon’s most prolific reviewer, A. Chandler is Amazon’s top critic, based on the 27,127 out of 27,816 readers that found her 467 reviews useful.

At Yelp, which opened a 200-plus-employee regional sales office in Scottsdale last year, so-called “elite” reviewers are regularly feted at social events hosted by the company. Yelp reviewers are nominated, sometimes by themselves, to become “elites” and are evaluated based on the quantity and quality of their reviews. Readers on most sites can rate the quality and usefulness of the critiques.

“The reviewers are constantly being reviewed themselves,” said Gabi Messinger, director of marketing for Yelp’s southwest regional office in Scottsdale.

Every day, Yelp picks a top review in each of the numerous markets it covers to be prominently featured on its site.

Sarah Grimwood has written 245 reviews of Phoenix-area restaurants and businesses since becoming a “Yelper” in 2007. Besides creating a platform for her comments, Grimwood has found Yelp an important social network and a source of many friendships.

“I didn’t know anybody when I moved here and met most of my friends through Yelp,” she said at a recent function for “elite” Yelp reviewers at Luci’s Healthy Marketplace in central Phoenix.

Andrea Karetsky, whose Yelp mantra is “party like a rock star,” has written 143 reviews and also spends a lot of time socializing with fellow “Yelpers.”

Kurdy Sin of Glendale is attracted to the writing process and constantly strives to improve his commentary.

“I love to write reviews,” he said.

Sin has created 115 reviews and hopes to have one selected as the top review of the day in the Phoenix market.

Army of reviewers

When everybody has an opinion, every business has to be on alert.

On opening night for Sam Fox’s latest restaurant, the Arrogant Butcher, there were practically as many critics as customers at the downtown Phoenix restaurant.

“They were out in force with their cellphones and iPads, taking pictures of the food and making notes,” Fox said.

His company, Scottsdale-based Fox Restaurant Concepts, operates 30 restaurants that are constantly being reviewed on Yelp and other sites.

There are 91 reviews of the Arrogant Butcher already posted on Yelp and 276 criticisms of Fox’s more established True Food Kitchen.

Fox takes his reviews in stride.

“We don’t live and die by reviews,” Fox said, offering that some can be off-base. “If we get a bad review of a restaurant that is packed every night with satisfied customers, we take it with a grain of salt.”

But he acknowledges the company can’t ignore the commentary.

“If it’s a valid complaint, we look at it as an opportunity to improve,” he said.

With more people relying on reviews to make decisions about where they spend their money, they can make or break a new business. And for entrepreneurs unaccustomed to public criticism, a bad review can be a jarring experience.

Erik Angermeier, owner of Slippery Pig Bike Shop in central Phoenix, said he was shocked when a Yelper complained about the dirty couch and being offered used parts for less money.

“Most people are happy to have the option of getting parts for less money,” he said.

Then, he said, he got a call from a salesperson at Yelp offering to “improve the company’s online reputation” for $300 per month.

“I took it as if they were offering to take down the negative review,” he said.

He turned them down and now wonders if the spate of negative reviews of his business is a result of his refusal to advertise.

Business of opinions

How opinions pop up on sites, and how the purchase of advertising can alter that, remains a big focus for the businesses being rated.

The sites insist that buying an ad or extra services has no bearing on the nature of the reviews they publish. But when a site is selling services to businesses of which it also is publishing reviews, there is at least the potential for abuse.

Basic hotel, restaurant and business listings on TripAdvisor and Yelp are free – but can be enhanced for a fee.

Businesses that advertise on Yelp pop at the top of searches, ahead of competitors with better ratings. Those businesses don’t have to worry about their listing being cluttered with Google ads from competing establishments.

On TripAdvisor, an extra fee nets a video and a link that, for example, allows customers to book directly with a hotel instead of through a booking site such as Expedia. And companies such as Expedia, which owns TripAdvisor, can pay to be listed as the top default booking site.

Restaurant-review site Zagat .com gets around the potential appearance of impropriety by charging consumers to access the site and not accepting advertising from restaurants.

Angie’s List requires reviewers to identify themselves and take an oath of honesty. Only businesses with high consumer marks are allowed to advertise.

At other sites, you have to take executives at their word that there “it doesn’t happen.”

Adam Medros, vice president of product at TripAdvisor, said that a business owner generally would not be happy with a bad review.

But he added, “There is no correlation between buying an ad and the reviews that appear on our site.”

He said the company encourages advertisers to publish a response to a negative review and to respond to legitimate criticism.

Yelp controversies

Yelp continues to be the subject of reports from small-business owners who contend that Yelp salespeople offer to hide negative reviews in exchange for advertising, a practice the company denies.

Yelp spokeswoman Stephanie Ichinose acknowledged that sales people may refer to a business’ reviews when making a sales call but never would offer to quash negative comments in exchange for advertising.

“Some businesses may leap to that conclusion, but that’s not the case,” she said.

Last year, two law firms filed a class-action lawsuit against Yelp on behalf of a Long Beach, Calif., veterinary hospital that drew that conclusion.

The suit, which accused Yelp of “implied extortion,” was dismissed by a U.S. District Court judge in April, who noted that the claims could not be backed up.

Owners of the veterinary hospital alleged that negative reviews reappeared when the business refused to buy advertising and that Yelp salespeople said they could control which reviews appeared on the site.

Yelp denied the allegations and said the business owners misunderstood how the site works.

Still, Yelp made changes. It took steps to enhance the integrity of its site by allowing access to reviews that had been flagged by its filters and quashed and also did away with the practice of allowing advertisers to feature a favorite review.

Yelp employs a complex system of algorithms and teams of investigators that weed out and remove from the site reviews that contain inaccuracies or authored by friends of the business, disgruntled employees or competitors attempting to manipulate the process.

“People can look at the reviews that get taken down and see there is no pattern of manipulation,” Ichinose said.

Gaming the system

Because anyone can post a review, it’s possible to take advantage of the system. Business owners could solicit friends to write positive reviews – or write them themselves. On the other hand, competitors or disgruntled employees could type in negative ones. Most reviews sites employ elaborate filters and algorithms to weed out potential bogus commentary.

Many of the complaints from businesses about Yelp have to do with positive reviews being taken down from the site while negative ones are allowed to remain.

“Nobody complains when a negative review gets taken down,” Ichinose said, adding that some of those positive critiques may have been written by friends of the business owner.

“It’s important to have controls in place so the site can remain trustworthy,” she said.

At most businesses, other reviewers and readers also can flag reviews that seem suspect.

At Zagat.com and other sites, flagged commentaries are turned over to a team for analysis and possible suppression.

“We’re always on the lookout for people trying to game the system,” said Tiffany Herklots, a spokeswoman for the restaurant rating site.

Ichinose acknowledged that legitimate reviews could be caught by Yelp’s filters and suppressed, but that the company continued to fine-tune and improve its monitoring systems.

“When we started in 2005, it was mainly looking at a review and asking ourselves, ‘Does this seem legitimate?’ ” Ichinose said of the review-filtration process. “Now it’s gotten very complex and a lot more accurate.”

TripAdvisor also employs computer programs and algorithms to weed out bogus reviews. On its site, hotels and restaurants suspected of trying to game the system are identified by a red badge.

“The red badge tells users that this hotel tried to manipulate the system,” said TripAdvisors’ Medros. “It’s a huge deterrent and can cost a hotel a lot of business.”

Medros suggested that instead of complaining about reviews and trying to beat the system, hotels, restaurants and other businesses should put effort into improving their products and responding to and addressing customer complaints.

“Travel is a variable experience and not every day will be good,” he said. “Most consumers realize that and look at the body of reviews and not a single out the negative ones.”

A lot of negative reviews, of course, could indicate a problem, he said.

“It is critical, then, that the owner responds,” Medros said.

Reach the reporter at max.jarman@arizonarepublic.com.

Budget, Unemployment Comp Reform and Taxpayer Protection on House Schedule

Budget, Unemployment Comp Reform and Taxpayer Protection on House Schedule

Budget, Unemployment Comp Reform and Taxpayer Protection on House Schedule

The state House returns to session on Monday, May 23, to pass a General Appropriations bill (the state budget) and deal with various issues of importance.
Budget: Setting the Right Priorities, Spending with Sustainable Revenues

House Republicans are shifting budget priorities to education funding over welfare spending. The House will vote next week on a budget (House Bill 1485) which is a responsible, on-time, pay-as-you-go budget that includes no new taxes or new borrowing – ending the trend of spending money we don¢t have. The House budget cuts back the proposed hike in the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) spending to redistribute those funds to education. DPW lost $1.7 billion in one-time federal stimulus funds, which totals 16 percent of its fiscal year 2010-11 budget. Obviously, adjustments are necessary.

The House budget aims to more equitably distribute available resources to support the most important state programs. The House proposal breaks from the past by not spending money which is not reliable or sustainable.
Unemployment Compensation, Bringing Integrity to the System

House Bill 916 proposes several commonsense reforms to the unemployment compensation system. The reform legislation preserves the fiscal integrity of the system for those claimants who act in good faith and are actively seeking employment.

The changes included would:

* Require applicants to actually search for a new job (currently, people just need to be “available” to search for a job).
* Treat severance pay as wages, thus offsetting them from benefits. Currently, 32 states take into account dismissal pay. Twenty-three states have a prorated offset for receipt of dismissal (severance) pay, including Delaware, Maryland, and Ohio. Nine states have laws that disqualify individuals for benefits for weeks they receive dismissal payments. The Department of Labor and Industry estimates this change could save as much as $88 million in benefit outlays from the Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund

Mandate Relief, Property Tax Hike Voice, and Pay-to-Play Reform to Protect Taxpayers

Next week, the House will take up House Bill 1411 which will limit the information school districts collect to only what is required by the federal government for reimbursement purposes. The bill partially suspends what is known as the PIMS/PELICAN/ELN management information systems which will save school districts money due to the cost of data collection and input.

House Bill 1021 will make attorney contingency fee contracts more transparent in the procurement process. The bill puts forth policies and procedures the Office of General Counsel would need to follow if it chooses to commit the Commonwealth into attorney contingency fee contracts.

Removing exemptions from referendum requirements for Act 1 school property tax increases is the basis of House Bill 1326. Under the bill, school districts would not be permitted to raise taxes beyond an inflationary index without putting the increase to a referendum vote.
The Weekly Schedule

Bill numbers will be used to identify the legislation being considered either in committee or on the House floor. The bills, sponsors and summaries are posted below.

Monday, May 23

Committee Meetings/Hearings

* FINANCE, 11 a.m., Room 60, East Wing
o HB 665 (Rep. Doug Reichley, R-Berks/Lehigh): Allows a surviving spouse to file a joint return if they would have been able to file a joint return had the deceased spouse lived the entire year. If both spouses die, the fiduciary of the estate may file a joint return if the spouses would have been eligible to do so had they survived the entire year.
o HB 1333 (Rep. George Dunbar, R-Westmoreland): Provides an exception from a penalty for failure to make estimated tax payments and adds a special tax provision for poverty within an existing exception.
o HB 1334 (Rep. Dick Hess, R-Fulton/Bedford/Huntingdon): Replaces the semi-monthly sales tax return requirement with a single monthly return, showing both an estimated tax for the current month and an actual payment for the prior month, for taxpayers whose total tax reported for the third quarter of the preceding year equals or exceeds $25,000.
* VETERANS AFFAIRS AND EMERGECY PREPAREDNESS, 11 a.m., Room G-50, Irvis Office Building
o Informational meeting with the Adjutant General on the status of current DMVA programs for veterans and the Pennsylvania National Guard.

Session

On Monday, the House will convene at 1 p.m. for legislative business. The members will vote the uncontested calendar and Rule 35 resolutions.

Votes on Second Consideration

* HB 916 (Rep. Scott Perry, R-York/Cumberland): Changes the PA Unemployment Compensation Law by increasing the amount of wages necessary to establish credit week from $50 to “sixteen times the minimum wage rate”; establishes a process for base year employers to obtain relief from charges; requires claimants to make an active search for suitable employment; increases the earnings required before reapplying for benefits from six-times the weekly benefit rate to ten-times the weekly benefit rate; tightens the eligibility for individuals who voluntarily quit their employment; defines willful misconduct; calculates the weekly benefit rate on the average of the two highest quarters in a claimant¢s base year, rather than on the single highest quarter of their base year; increases the minimum number of credit weeks that a claimant must have in their base year to qualify for benefits from 16 to 18; increases the time period used to calculate the maximum weekly benefit rate from one to three years; creates offset for receipt of severance pay; and allows either party to provide testimony at hearings via telephone
* HB 1336 (Rep. Bob Godshall, R-Montgomery): Adds the definition of “home improvement retailer” to the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, expands allowable forms of identification for registration purposes with the Bureau of Consumer Protection, establishes a restricted revenue account in the General Fund to be used for consumer education, and amends prohibited acts.
* HB 1485 (Rep. Bill Adolph, R-Delaware): The General Appropriation Act of 2011.
* HR 244 (Rep. Kevin Murphy, D-Lackawanna): Commemorates the 25th anniversary of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985(COBRA).

Votes on Third Consideration

* HB 170 (Rep. Ron Miller, R-York): Amends Vehicle Code provisions relating to driving on the right side of the roadway, overtaking vehicles on the left, no passing zones, and minimum speed regulations to incorporate provisions relating to pedalcycles.
* HB 1053 (Rep. Mauree Gingrich, R-Lebanon): Amends the Crimes Code to provide for the offense of neglect of a care-dependent person and creates the offense of abuse of a care-dependent person.

* HB 257 (Rep. Seth Grove, R-York): Eliminates the need for the approval of the Department of Education, via PLANCON, for school construction projects that are not eligible for state reimbursement.
* HB 285 (Rep. Mark Keller, R-Perry/Franklin): Increases the dollar amount, in the Public School Code, for purchases that are subject to advertising requirements from $10,000 to $25,000, increases the dollar amount for contracts that would require written or telephonic price quotations from three qualified contractors from $4,000 to $7,000, and provides for the annual adjustment of the aforementioned amounts based on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.
* HB 815 (Rep. Seth Grove): Adds a criminal offense of sexting by minors, a misdemeanor of the second-degree, provides for adjudicatory alternatives and record expungement, and amends the existing child pornography statute to reflect the addition of this offense.

* HB 1055 (Rep. Mark Mustio, R-Allegheny): Provides for the registration and regulation of professional employer organizations and sets forth the powers and duties of the Department of Labor and Industry.
* HB 1278 (Rep. Joseph Brennan, D-Lehigh/Northampton): Amends the Liquor Code to allow certain licensees to sell liquor and malt or brewed beverages for consumption off the licensed premises so long as those licensees are located within the boundaries of an entity utilizing a special occasion permit.
* HB 1345 (Rep. John Taylor, R-Philadelphia): Moves the Office of Safe Schools Advocate for the Philadelphia school district from Pennsylvania¢s Department of Education to the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency.

Tuesday, May 24

Committee Meetings/Hearings

* VETERANS AFFAIRS AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, 8:45 a.m., Room 205, Ryan Office Building
o HB 973 (Rep. Deberah Kula, D-Fayette/Westmoreland): Requires funeral directors and crematories to ascertain whether a deceased person is a veteran, a spouse of a veteran, or a dependent child of a veteran and requires proper notification to a veteran¢s organization for burial arrangements if the remains go unclaimed.
o Informational meeting with the Pennsylvania State Veterans Commission and the Pennsylvania War Veterans Council on legislative priorities.
* INSURANCE, 9 a.m., Room 39, East Wing
o HB 424 (Rep. Robert Godshall): Increases the penalty for certain violations of the Public Adjuster Licensing Law from a misdemeanor to a third-degree felony, states that prosecution for violations is at the discretion of the Insurance Commissioner, and further states that violations under the Public Adjuster Licensing Law may also violate the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.
* JUDICIARY, 9 a.m., Room B-31, Main Capitol Building
o HB 1025 (Rep. Thomas Caltagirone, D-Berks): Increases the dollar amount threshold necessary for the county clerk of courts to report the judgment to the prothonotary from $1,000 to $5,000 and establishes a triennial inflation adjustment of the threshold based on the local urban workers consumer price index.
o HB 1436 (Rep. Tarah Toohil, R-Luzerne): Increases the penalty of official oppression from a misdemeanor of the second-degree to a felony of the third-degree, establishes a minimum sentence of two years for anyone convicted of official oppression, and allows the court to order the convicted person to make restitution for all reasonable expenses incurred by the victim or on the victim¢s behalf.
o HB 1546 (Rep. Tarah Toohil): Allows the Juvenile Court Judges¢ Commission to analyze trends, evidence-based programs and practices; to make recommendations to judges, the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, and other appropriate entities; and to post appropriate information on the commission¢s website.
o HB 1567 (Rep. Karen Boback, R-Columbia/Luzerne/Wyoming): Amends the Public Employee Pension Forfeiture Act to provide for forfeiture upon the employee/official¢s entry of a guilty plea or upon entry of a jury verdict or judicial order of guilty. Currently, forfeiture is not triggered until the public official or employee is sentenced.
o SB 1006 (Sen. Elder Vogel, R-Allegheny/Beaver/Lawrence): Adds bath salts, Salvia Divinorum, and synthetic marijuana to the list of schedule one narcotics.
* LOCAL GOVERNMENT, 9:15 a.m., Room G-50, Irvis Office Building
o HB 1441 (Rep. Chris Ross, R-Chester): Allows the Local Government Commission to electronically publish local government codes on its website.
o HB 1446 (Rep. Chris Ross): Authorizes municipalities, under the First Class Township Code, to enter into an employment agreement with a municipal manager and clarifies the process through which a municipality may create and abolish the office of municipal manger.
o HB 1447 (Rep. Chris Ross): Authorizes municipalities, under the Second Class Township Code, to enter into an employment agreement with a township manager and clarifies the process through which a municipality may create and abolish the office of township manger.
o HB 1448 (Rep. Chris Ross): Authorizes incorporated towns to enter into an employment agreement with a township manager and clarifies the process through which an incorporated town may create and abolish the office of township manager.
o HB 1449 (Rep. Chris Ross): Authorizes boroughs to enter into an employment agreement with a borough manager and clarifies the process through which a borough may create and abolish the office of borough manager.
o HB 1450 (Rep. Chris Ross): Authorizes third class cities to enter into an employment agreement with a city administrator/manager, clarifies the process through which a third class city may create and abolish the office of city administrator/manager, and establishes the powers and duties of a city administrator/manager.
o HB 1451 (Rep. Chris Ross): Allows county tax claims bureaus to recover, through sale proceeds, costs that they may incur in maintaining upset properties in salable condition or in compliance with maintenance codes. It does not create any affirmative duty on the part of the county or tax claims bureau to rehabilitate or maintain the property and it shall not impose any liability for injuries to persons or property that may occur on the property subject to the rehabilitation or maintenance.
o HB 1453 (Rep. Chris Ross): Expands the authorized methods of recording and storing judicial records to include optical imaging technology and establishes that a copy of any record that has been destroyed, or disposed of as provided by law, shall be admissible in evidence in any matter with the same force and effect as if the original record had been produced.
o HB 1452 (Rep. Chris Ross): Allows volunteer members of emergency management teams to receive workers¢ compensation for injuries sustained while responding to an emergency or while performing any other duties authorized by the municipality.
* AGING AND OLDER ADULT SERVICES, 9:30 a.m., Room 60, East Wing
o Informational meeting with the Pennsylvania Assisted Living Association.
* HEALTH, 10 a.m., Room 205, Ryan Office Building
o HB 1362 (Rep. Brandon Neuman, D-Washington): Requires student athletes to obtain a baseline concussion screening with their required pre-participation physical examination and establishes that any student athlete that shows signs consistent with a concussion during athletic activity must be immediately removed from practice and competition and may not return to the athletic activity until another baseline concussion screening is performed and the athlete has been cleared by an appropriate medical professional.
* LEGISLATIVE BUDGET AND FINANCE, 10 a.m., Hearing Room 3, North Office Building
o Meeting to discuss and release performance audit reports on Pennsylvania¢s Access to Justice Act and the adequacy of fees charged in Pennsylvania¢s instant check system for firearms purchases.
* PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE, 10 a.m., Room B-31, Main Capitol Building
o HB 1280 (Rep. Tony Payton, Jr, D-Philadelphia): Allows acupuncturists to provide services to individuals who show no symptoms of a condition without a medical diagnosis and requires acupuncturists to obtain and maintain professional liability insurance coverage of at least $1 million per occurrence or claims made.
o Reg. 16A-677: Establishes continued competency requirements for licensed occupational therapists as a condition of license renewal and reactivation and sets forth the fees for continued competency providers and course approvals. Effective the first biennium following publication, the regulation would require all licensed occupational therapists to complete a minimum of 24 contact hours in at least two acceptable continued competency activities each biennium, after their first biennial renewal period, as a condition of license renewal.
* STATE GOVERNMENT, 10 a.m., Room 39, East Wing
o Informational meeting on HB 726 (Rep. Stan Saylor, R-York County): Requires the head of each Commonwealth agency to submit to the Secretary of the Budget and the General Assembly, by Sept. 30, 2012, a strategic plan for all program activities, covering a period of no less than four years forward from the fiscal year in which it is submitted. Further requires agency performance-based budgets, annual performance reports, a Commonwealth performance budget crafted by the Independent Fiscal Office, and provides for Auditor General authority, legislative oversight, training, and two pilot projects.
* TRANSPORTATION, 10 a.m., Room G-50, Irvis Office Building
o HB 1173 (Rep. Tom Killion, R-Chester/Delaware): Regarding metropolitan transportation authorities, this bill makes editorial changes to refer to the codified version of the Sunshine Act and removes the requirement that, on rail passenger units, only bids for interior advertising shall be solicited.
o HB 1203 (Rep. John Lawrence, R-Chester): Allows owners of antique or classic vehicles to request permission to display vintage registration plates from the model year of the vehicle so long as the vintage registration plate is: provided by the owner, originally issued between the years 1906 and 1975, and legible from a reasonable distance. A $75 application fee is established and vintage registration plates are not permissible for general daily use.
o HB 1304 (Rep. Harry Readshaw, D-Allegheny): Alters the appointment of the Pittsburgh Port Authority Board from being strictly under county executive jurisdiction to include appointments from the governor and the majority and minority leaders of the state House of Representatives and the state Senate.
o HB 1355 (Rep. Curt Sonney, R-Erie): Bridge designation: Jarrid L. King Memorial Bridge.
o HB 1399 (Rep. Scott Perry): Expands the definition of “motorcycle” to include vehicles designed to travel on two wheels in contact with the ground that have been modified to include two stabilizing wheels on the rear of the motor vehicle.
o HB 1458 (Rep. Will Tallman, R-Adams/York): Establishes that a violation regarding nonreciprocity of operational limitations is a summary offense that carries, on conviction, a fine of no less than $500 and no more than $1,000.
* LABOR AND INDUSTRY, Call of the Chair, Room 205, Irvis Office Building
o HB 1548 (Rep. Thomas Murt, R-Montgomery/Philadelphia): Comprehensive amendment of the Child Labor Law to address: prohibitions on employment or work in certain establishments, including establishments that sell alcohol; restrictions on hours of labor; educational requirements for working minors; the permit applications process with the Department of Labor and Industry, which includes an initial $350 fee and a $200 renewal fee; the establishment of a trust account for the working minor and the transfer of the minor¢s earnings into their trust account; and the participation of minors in reality television or documentaries.
* CONSUMER AFFAIRS, Call of the Chair, Room B-31, Main Capitol Building
o HB 10 (Rep. Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny): Eliminates the state-mandated monopoly on transit services in Allegheny County, expands the jurisdiction of the Public Utility Commission to include regulation of all transportation services in second class counties except those provided by a port authority located within the second class county, and requires port authorities within second class counties to supply an annual report to the Consumer Affairs and Transportation committees of the General Assembly.

Session

On Tuesday the House will meet at 11 a.m. for legislative business.

Votes on Second Consideration

* HB 382 (Rep. Jim Cox, R-Berks County): Extends the registry of a phone number on Pennsylvania¢s “Do Not Call” list from five years to indefinitely, or until the number is no longer valid for the subscriber.
* HB 1219 (Rep. Dick Hess): Bridge designation: Donald H. Clark Memorial Bridge.

* HB 1264 (Rep. Cherelle Parker, D-Philadelphia): Allows for the use of expert testimony in cases where a conviction would result in the requirement to register under Megan¢s Law and cases relating to statutory sexual assault. Testimony relates to the response of the victim.
* HB 1459 (Rep. Chris Ross): Amends the Third Class City Code civil service provision relating to the promotion of police officers in optional charter and plan cities.
* HB 1460 (Rep. Chris Ross): Requires a background investigation for the hiring and promotion of first class township civil service police and firemen.
* HB 1461 (Rep. Chris Ross): Requires a background investigation for the hiring and promotion of borough civil service police and firemen.

* HB 1411 (Rep. Brian Ellis, R-Butler): Partially suspends PIMS/PELICAN/ELN management information systems for school districts by limiting input to federally required data or that needed for Commonwealth reimbursements.
* HB 1424 (Rep. Stephen Bloom, R-Cumberland): Requires the Department of Agriculture to create, license, and promote the Pennsylvania Preferred Trademark for the sale or promotion of a Pennsylvania-based agricultural commodity and creates the PA Preferred Trademark Licensing Fund.

Votes on Third Consideration

* HB 916 (Rep. Scott Perry)
* HB 1336 (Rep. Bob Godshall)
* HB 1485 (Rep. Bill Adolph)

Wednesday, May 25

Committee Meetings/Hearings

* AGING AND OLDER ADULT SERVICES, 9:30 a.m., Room G-50, Irvis Office Building
o HB 511 (Rep. Tim Hennessey, R-Chester): Provided that a pharmacy agrees to participate in a provider network, this bill prohibits any health insurance company, agent, contractor, government program or pharmacy benefit manager in the administration of a health insurance policy from restricting access to retail community pharmacy services.
o HR 106 (Rep. Martin Causer, R-Cameron/Potter/McKean): Directs the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a study of the Pennsylvania Lottery to analyze its ability to continue to support programs and services for older Pennsylvanians.
* GAME AND FISHERIES, 9:30 a.m., Room 39, East Wing
o HB 1236 (Rep. John Evans, R-Crawford/Erie): Reduces the active duty service requirement from 180 to 60 consecutive days for reduced-fee fishing licenses.
o HB 1237 (Rep. John Evans): Reduces the active duty service requirement from 180 to 60 consecutive days for reduced-fee hunting licenses.
o HB 1398 (Rep. Edward Staback, D-Lackawanna/Wayne): Bans future possession of certain exotic wildlife by the general public by ending the issuance of general exotic wildlife possession permits as of January 1, 2012, and redefines “Exotic Wildlife” and “Exotic Wildlife Dealer.”
o HB 1417 (Rep. Edward Staback): Adds Wildlife Conservation Officers and Waterway Conservation Officers to the list of officials protected against aggravated assault, making assault causing bodily injury a second-degree felony, assault causing serious bodily injury a first-degree felony, and the discharge of firearm during assault a first-degree felony.
o SB 274 (Sen. Richard Alloway, R-Adams/Franklin/York): Allows the Pennsylvania Game Commission to establish regulations to permit the transfer of certain tags or permits from a licensed mentor hunter to a youth hunter participating in the Mentored Youth Hunting Program, changes the falconry permit fee structure from $25 per bird to a flat $50 fee, and lowers the minimum age for a falconry permit from 16 to 12.
* INSURANCE, 9:30 a.m., Room 205, Ryan Office Building
o Public hearing on American Health Benefits Exchanges.
* URBAN AFFAIRS, 9:30 a.m., Room 60, East Wing
o SB 353 (Sen. Wayne Fontana, D-Allegheny): Prohibits the issuance of private transfer fee obligations, establishes liability for damages incurred on individuals who impose private transfer fee obligations after the effective date, requires disclosure of existing transfer fees in any contract for the sale of real property, and requires the payee of existing transfer fee obligations to forward to the recorder of deeds in each relevant county specific information on the nature of the transfer fee obligation within six months of the effective date or else the transfer fee obligation shall become void.
* ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 10 a.m., Room B-31, Main Capitol Building
o HB 1416 (Rep. Eli Evankovich, R-Armstrong/Westmoreland): Requires the Department of Environmental Protection to submit annual reports to the governor and the General Assembly regarding the funding and expenditures of the Clean Water Fund, the Solid Waste Abatement Fund, and the Clean Air Fund.
o SB 302 (Sen. Mary Jo White, R-Clarion/Forest/Venango/Butler/Erie/Warren): Establishes July 1 as the annual deadline for the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the Department of Education, the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, and the State System of Higher Education to publish their annual report regarding their use of Keystone Funds.

Session

On Wednesday the House will meet at 11 a.m. for legislative business.

Votes on Second Consideration

* HB 463 (Rep. Michele Brooks, R-Crawford/Lawrence/Mercer): Allows individuals enrolled in PACE and PACENET as of Dec. 31, 2010, to remain eligible for the programs if the maximum income limit is exceeded due solely to Social Security cost-of-living adjustments.
* HB 608 (Rep. Michele Brooks): Directs the Department of Environmental Protection to encourage the planting of bioenergy crops on abandoned mine lands and establishes a full-cost bonding program to provide sum-certain guarantees to cover Stage III reclamation liabilities on areas replanted with bioenergy crops.

* HB 838 (Rep. John Bear, R-Lancaster): Defines “ophthalmic surgery” and clarifies that the practice of optometry shall not include ophthalmic surgery.
* HB 1326 (Rep. Seth Grove): Removes exemptions from referendum requirement for Act 1 school property tax increases and ties future increases to rate of inflation (without a referendum).

* HB 864 (Rep. Rick Geist, R-Blair): Increases the membership of the Pedalcycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee from 15 to 17 by adding two more public appointees and generalizes the requirements for the public appointees.
* HB 934 (Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Butler): Requires proof of identification for voting at every election and allows for provisional ballots if proof of identification cannot be produced based on either religious beliefs or indigence.
* HB 1021 (Rep. Tim Krieger, R-Westmoreland): Requires agencies to solicit specified professional services through a request for proposal process; requires the disclosure of the method of compensation; limits contingent fee compensation to no more than 20 percent of the settlement or $25 million, whichever is less; and requires contracts for legal services to specify that Commonwealth attorneys retain control over the course and conduct of any legal action.

Votes on Third Consideration

* HB 382 (Rep. Jim Cox)
* HB 1219 (Rep. Dick Hess)
* HB 1424 (Rep. Stephen Bloom)
* HB 1459 (Rep. Chris Ross)

* HB 1411 (Rep. Brian Ellis)

* HB 1460 (Rep. Chris Ross)
* HB 1461 (Rep. Chris Ross)

Print Article��Email to a friend

 


St. George¢s Bethesda 2nd Literary LuncheonThe Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton U.S. Secretary of State U.S. Department of StatePanelists Affirm Greece¢s Strategic Importance to U.S. AHI Policy Seminar Examines Geopolitical, Energy, and Defense Industry Sectors “The Promise of Tomorrow 1940-1960” @ the San Francisco Greek Film FestivalBrisk Walking Could Improve Prostate Cancer OutcomesThe Hellenic Times Scholarship Fund GALA Turns 20 By: Markos Papadatos, Staff ReporterRonald McDonald House hosts 16th Greek Marathon of Love in New YorkOne Woman¢s Tireless Efforts Bring Hope to the HopelessWithout Taking Sides, One Man Tries A Fresh Approach To End The Ongoing Debate On EvolutionCOMPTROLLER LIU STATEMENT ON EDC LIVING WAGE STUDYASSEMBLYWOMAN MALLIOTAKIS SAYS JUDGE IS RIGHT ON THE MONEY WITH CIGARETTE TAX RULINGBring home foreign earnings By: Andy SternDan Georgakas presented his book at Holy Trinity in ManhattanCyprus-US Chamber of Commerce honors Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Christopher PissaridesMacedonia-Evidence Letter to President of the United States, Barack ObamaSix Tips For Businesses Waiting for Economic Recovery CPA Reveals 6 Killer Ideas For After the RecessionAHI Condemns Demolition of 200-Year-Old Orthodox Church in Occupied CyprusGreeks Abroad and Philhellenes: The catalyst that may quickly and effectively lead Greece out of the crisis.“THE HIMARA COMMUNITY OF AMERICA”Barrar Recognizes Loyalty Day in PennsylvaniaThank you for having Agape Match, NYC’s premiere matchmaking service, at the Hermes Expo. It was truly a pleasure being an exhibitor.AHEPA Makes Available Emergency Relief Fund to Aid Victims of Deadly Storms, Tornadoes in the South Hellenic Medical Society of Philadelphia Continuing Medical Education Event at Hermes Expo, April 2, 2011: ¡La Maria¢ Performance a Huge Hit and Fundraising Success for the new National Hellenic Museum

Mercury News interview: Tony Bates, Skype CEO

Click photo to enlarge

Tony Bates has had an eventful seven months as Skype’s new CEO.

The company has consolidated its local offices to Palo Alto, announced plans to hire hundreds of new workers, added a video calling feature to its iPhone and Android applications and acquired a competitor, all while preparing for a planned public offering. To cap it off, the Internet calling company announced earlier this month that instead of going public, it had agreed to be acquired by Microsoft for a whopping $8.6 billion in cash.

As part of the merger, which still has to be approved by regulators, Bates, a former Cisco Systems (CSCO) executive, will become president of Microsoft’s new Skype division and report directly to CEO Steve Ballmer. Bates will be charged with growing Skype’s business and will help oversee efforts to connect Skype with Microsoft’s other products.

That could prove a big challenge. eBay (EBAY), which previously owned Skype, famously failed in its efforts to integrate the company into its auction business. Meanwhile, few Skype users actually pay to use its services — and many may resist doing so.

In

an interview with this newspaper, Bates talked about why the Microsoft deal makes sense, why things will work better with this acquisition and how the company plans to diversify its revenue. The interview was edited for length and clarity.

Q Prior to getting this unsolicited bid from Microsoft, Skype was planning on going public. Why did Skype agree to the deal instead?

A The thing that made it exciting for Skype was a shared view of the way we see communications evolving. If you think about Skype’s value proposition, it’s been around making it easy and seamless to communicate, both with audio and then video from the desktop to, more recently, mobile. Also to the living room. And if you look at the Microsoft strategy, there’s a lot of similarities. Not just to be a calling capability, but much more than that.

When they made the commitment to allow us to continue to support multiple devices, Microsoft and non-Microsoft, it felt right, and the board was behind it, and we went for it.

Q Given that Microsoft is paying 10 times more than Skype’s annual revenue, wasn’t this basically a “Godfather” deal, one that you couldn’t refuse?

A Everything’s a balance in life. It was a great offer. But from my perspective, that was secondary to the broader mission, which is becoming a global communications services provider that can hit a billion people. This just helped us accelerate that.

Q Why will this deal work better than when eBay acquired Skype?

A It’s hard for me to comment why the eBay deal didn’t work, because I wasn’t part of the company. When I think about why it will be a success: One is we really think about things in the same way. We also come from a heritage of starting on the Windows platform, so there’s a technology alignment.

The second piece of it is the approach that we are a division reporting directly to the CEO. That was never done before. It’s not just about the organization; it’s sort of a statement of strategic intent and strategic alignment.

And then, just for me, they’re focused in many ways on bringing tools and software capabilities to businesses and consumers, as we are. And so I just feel that, from that perspective, there’s just a very strong alignment.

I’m sure there was a lot of focus last time. This one feels like it’s very focused on being part of the company with a set of strategic parameters that play to the strengths of Skype.

Q Only about 1 percent of your total registered users actually pay to use Skype, while about 86 percent of your revenue comes from your SkypeOut calling service. How does Microsoft help you to diversify that revenue base?

A We haven’t monetized a large amount of our highly engaged base. We have more than 170 million users every month. But we also have a heavy amount of engagement; the average is more than 100 minutes per user per month. So that opens up a door toward an advertising business model.

We have started that. It shows up in our PC client today. But we need some innovation to that ad model — not just doing display ads, but also thinking about interactive multimedia ads (and) ads that could be in-call. We really believe that there is a model for that, particularly in the audio in-call model.

Microsoft has a lot of experience on the enterprise side. So that would be an area we can extend to. But they also have a strong ad sales force. They were actually one of the most innovative display-ad companies early on through their Messenger platform. They bring a lot of experiences as we start to experiment and try new ad formats.

Q How much more pressure will there be on you as the head of the Skype division to accelerate the development of new revenue sources, given how much money Microsoft is paying for Skype and its need for a decent a return on its investment for shareholders?

A I actually think it’s no difference. That same pressure was there if we were independent, maybe more so, because at the end of the day, we would be talking to a broader shareholder base as well. So I see no difference.

We’ve got to grow our base. We’ve got to keep our users engaged. And then monetize accordingly, so we can continue to reinvest and innovate at a pace that our user community wants.

Contact Troy Wolverton at 408-840-4285.

Five things about Tony Bates

1. Was part of the team that transferred the National Science Foundation’s data network to commercial Internet service providers, a key move in the commercialization of the Internet.
2. Helped build some of the biggest routers ever. Every time Internet users access the network, their data almost certainly travels through them.
3. Served on the board of directors of YouTube before it was acquired by Google.
4. Has four sons.
5. Grandfather worked as a copy editor for the U.K.’s Daily Mirror newspaper.

Tony Bates

Age: 44
Birthplace: Isleworth, U.K.
Position: CEO, Skype
Previous jobs: Senior vice president, Cisco Systems; director, YouTube
Education: Left university after one year
Family: Married, four sons
Residence: Los Altos
Other interests: Travel, skiing, family

YouTube Promoted Videos Now Priced Per View

  • Comment

youtubepromoted

It’s not so often we get to talk about AdWords here at ReelSEO, but I keep a keen eye on their blog because tidbits of fascinatingly shiny news pop up now and again….oooh shiny! Anyway, I just saw a post from yesterday that said they are switching up the way the bidding on Promoted Videos work on YouTube. Formerly they were cost-per-click (CPC) much like AdWords search. Well now they’re changing all that. Here’s why that’s good news.

According to the blog, on May 25th Promoted Videos will change to cost-per-view (CPV). So that weights the cost toward people actually seeing the video. Previously, it was CPC so when a user clicked on the Promoted Video you were charged, but they didn’t necessarily see the video. Now the user must click and then initiate viewing of the video.

That sounds much better for you as video advertisers because a click didn’t necessarily mean there was a video view initiated and now the cost is shifted toward the value of a viewer actually starting and watching the video. This is definitely a good thing for Promoted Videos if you ask me.

Here’s what Baljeet Singh, Senior Product Manager, YouTube had to say about the new system

How Bids Work

When you create your Promoted Video ad, you’ll be asked to set a maximum CPV, which is the maximum amount you’re willing to pay for a video view. Promoted Videos use the AdWords discounter to automatically reduce your costs. As always, we’ll only charge you one cent more than the next advertiser on the page competing for the same or similar keywords/placements, ensuring auction-driven efficiencies.

What You’ll See

As before, Promoted Video campaigns can be set up and managed right in AdWords or via ads.youtube.com. As of May 25th, billing terms from all Promoted Videos campaigns will officially convert from CPC to CPV and will be reflected in your advertising dashboards in both systems. If you’re using AdWords to purchase Promoted Videos on YouTube, you may continue to see mentions of CPCs in your campaign dashboard as we introduce additional CPV formats and adjust verbiage in the system.
Please visit the Help Center for more details and FAQs. Our hope is that this change in the pricing model aligns Promoted Videos more closely with your goals, driving the right results for your business.

The Take Away

This is a major change if you think about it. Formerly Promoted Videos were treated just like search ads. However, there’s a major difference. A search ad, when clicked on, generally leads the user right to more information about your product or brand. A Promoted Video would take them to the page with the video, but they wouldn’t really get engaged with the product or brand. So you were probably not seeing a very good conversion ratio or completion rates for your campaigns.

Now, since the user has to initiate a viewing of the video, they will be more engaged. You’ve got them into a click stream where they clicked to get to the page, clicked to start the video… perhaps they’ll click for more information (if you’ve got a good call-to-action) or click on another video or click on a buy now link, etc.

It’s that old social psychology principle, if you startchris car salesman them off saying yes (clicking) it will be easier to get them to say yes later (clicking more). Car salesmen use this trick a lot… can I get you something to drink? Would you like to have a seat? Can I get you into a hugely overpriced, gas-guzzling car that you don’t really need because your current car actually is just fine but you think you might need a new status symbol?

If you answered yes, then I might have to switch jobs… Kung Pao I’m out!

Spread the word: Learn more about: Video Advertising, , , , , , , , , , About the Author – Christophor Rick
Christophor Rick is a freelance writer specializing in technology, new media and consumer electronics. He is the CEO at Gamers Daily News (http://www.gamersdailynews.com) and his past work has included press releases, copy-writing, travel writing and journalism.
Feel free to contact Christophor here.

View All Posts By Christophor Rick

Intuit’s CEO Discusses Q3 2011 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Peter Goldmacher with Cowen and Company.

Peter Goldmacher – Cowen and Company, LLC

Hey, Brad, I want to ask you a question. First, the easy question. Earlier in the year, you had taken down earnings guidance for the first half of the year because you were accelerating marketing spend. When you look at your results this quarter, how do you allocate the upside from that marketing spend being productive earlier? And then the second question, I want to ask is you is you mentioned 2 things. You made sort of 2 quasi commitments I haven’t really heard you make before around geographies and a move to 75% of your revenue from connected services. What’s going on in those 2 areas that you can be specific about that’s giving you the confidence to sort of draw a line in the sand today?

Brad Smith

So let me start first with the question around bringing down earnings on guidance. We didn’t bring down our guidance on earnings. We had a shift between the second quarter and the third quarter, and we tried to help clarify that for the street. But we never reduced our outlook for the balance of the year in terms of the earnings projection. The question that you added on to that particular point was around sales and marketing and the accelerated investments we made in the second quarter, and they played out the way we hoped. Basically, what they did was they drove category growth in tax, they drove customer acquisition and brought new customers into the franchise and tax and they did the same thing in Small Business if you look at our connected services offerings. QuickBooks Online was up 42%. QuickBooks Enterprise was up 26%. Merchant growth in Payments was up 12%. So the whole guide for us, as you know, is to get customers into the franchise and then grow lifetime value over time. And our accelerated spend up into the first part of the year helped us do that as we played out the rest of the year. So our guidance did not go down in the second quarter, but our accelerated spend did exactly what we hoped to do in sales and marketing. The second part of your question around geography and connected services, at our Investor Day, we tried to articulate that we have some goals around our core businesses. And we also have some goals around what we expect out of our adjacencies in the next several years. And we’ve said that we’d like to see a couple of points of growth come out of some of these adjacent opportunities, which includes global expansion, and that’s what I was hoping to reiterate today on the call. And ultimately, we are seeing the shift. You can see it happening in all the businesses, in TurboTax, the majority of tax filings now coming in through the web. You can see the same thing happening now in QuickBooks with the shift to online into mobile payments. And so that’s why we feel confident that our mix shift, which today is about 60%, will continue to shift more to connected services, and we hope to get it to 75% by the year 2015. So I hope that answers the questions, Peter.

Peter Goldmacher – Cowen and Company, LLC

Yes, it did.

Operator

Next in the line, we have Walter Pritchard with Citi.

Walter Pritchard – Citigroup Inc

I’m wondering if you could talk a bit about ASPs in tax, and in other years, I think you’ve gotten into your growth with a little bit more reliance on pricing. And just help us understand if, going forward, if we — you should think of it as you guys getting a little bit more maybe aggressive and trying to drive the numbers through a lower price — not necessarily a lower price because you did see ASP increases but just kind of the shape of the tax year this year and kind of how we’re thinking about it going forward.

Brad Smith

Yes, I’d be happy to, Walter. In our tax business, there’s 4 key levers. The first is how many people are going to file taxes in the United States, and there’s typically about a 1% growth rate in a non-recessionary period. And it looks like right now, according to what the IRS has published, that’s pretty much the way the season’s going to play out. The second key lever is how fast the digital category grows. Of those people who file taxes, how many chose desktop and online software, and that historically is growing about 6% to 8% a year. This year, it looks like it’s going to be in the higher end of that range. We got good strong category growth as more people move to digital solutions. The third key lever is what is our share of that digital category. And for the fourth consecutive year, we took share this year. And then the fourth lever is revenue per return, and that doesn’t usually come through price. That comes through more effective free-to-pay conversion. It comes through additional services, like state products sold to someone who’s doing a federal return. And it also comes from favorable mix, like people coming in and not starting out with the entry-level product but maybe using the premier product. And we saw that happening this year as well. So what you saw this year, I think, was a really good balance of the 4 levers, tax filings getting to more normalized levels, the digital category accelerating in growth. We continue to take share and we got good revenue per return. The key as we look to the future, Walter, is we need to make sure we’re delivering good value for the price and our entry-level product is free. But as we look for opportunities to move up-market, there will be other areas where we may be able to take price when we compete against the tax store who’s usually 3x more expensive. But we want to make sure that we’re delivering the value the customer wants at a price they’re willing to pay. So those 4 levers I talked about are the way we grow the franchise over the long term.

Operator

Our next question comes from Adam Holt with Morgan Stanley.

Jennifer Swanson – Morgan Stanley

This is actually Jen Swanson, dialing in for Adam. I wanted to drill in a little bit on the comments you made earlier around QuickBooks and the shift in the business there from desktop units towards more of connected services and QuickBooks Online. And I had 2 questions, really, to that. One is, how much of that is push versus pull? So initially, your strategy with QuickBooks Online was an entry into the Intuit product set where you would grow from there versus directly competitive with the desktop offering. I’m wondering if that’s shifting a bit as you move up market with the online offering. And then two, if you think about the revenue impact, the growth this quarter in financial was a little — management solutions was a little bit slower than it’s been in the last few quarters. Do you think the growth rate in revenue there might be a little bit slower over the next few quarters or even years, as you do make that transition into online services?

Brad Smith

Let me start with the first one. What we’re finding with QuickBooks Online is the majority of those customers are new to the franchise and they’re new to the accounting software category. They actually aren’t customers from desktop moving over to online. And by the way, that is still a favorable trend for us. If you think about the average QuickBooks Desktop customer, they will come in at a price point of around $200 and they upgrade every 3 years. So over a 5-year period, call it roughly $500 to $600. Someone who comes in, in QuickBooks Online, pays an average of $24.95 a month. And over the same 5-year period, because they’re excited about having online backup in the cloud, anytime-anywhere access and the ability to use mobile devices, that same customer is usually worth about $1,500. So that shift for us is not only the way customers prefer to do business now more online, but it also helps us from a lifetime value perspective. And it’s easier to sell additional services online through hyperlinks than it is to make a phone call to a desktop customer and interrupt their day. So we have the ability to sell additional services easier as well. So net-net, the mix for us is not really a transition from desktop over to online. It’s new customers coming in to the category, and that’s favorable for us long-term on an ASP perspective. The second question in terms of the growth being down slightly with Financial Management Solutions being 11% growth in the third quarter, is really the result of a pretty tough compare. If you look at where we were in Q3 and Q4 of last year, we had some discounts going on in the marketplace. And QuickBooks had strong third, fourth quarter results. I’m actually very pleased to see us continuing to grow double digits as we grow over these tough compares. And we anticipate this business to continue to grow double digits as we look ahead over the next several years. So we don’t see that deceleration. We actually see an acceleration as we see our customers continue to adopt our online solutions, and I think we’ll continue to deliver that for many quarters to come.

Operator

Our next question comes from Sterling Auty with JPMorgan.

Sterling Auty – JP Morgan Chase Co

I just want to go back to one of the prepared remarks. I think you mentioned that as you look to next year, some of the things you’re looking to do better is actually on the execution front. Just kind of looking back on the tax season. What are maybe one or the 2 things that you thought you could have executed better on to show even better results through the tax season?

Brad Smith

Yes. So Sterling, let me first put it into perspective. While we’re waiting for the full season to play out and the IRS will publish the results once all the extensions have been filed in the third and fourth quarters of the calendar year, the net-net is, season to date, it looks like the software category, which is desktop and online, is still going to grow 2x to 2.5x faster than tax stores. And so despite the fact that this year was one of the best years tax stores have had as an industry in probably half a dozen years, the digital category is still outperforming 2x to 2.5x. So we’ve got the secular trends at our back. In terms of execution, though, I believe we could have kind of come out of the gate a lot stronger in the early part of the season. There was absolutely confusion in the market with the IRS and delayed processing. So I don’t think we came out of the gates as strong as we could have been. And so we want to make sure we’re playing whistle to whistle. The second thing is, we saw some really good actions coming from our competitor this year. I think we had some good action, but we’re going to take some lessons from that, and we will share more of that with you in our Investor Day in the fall. So I don’t want to give out too much of the goods right now because we’re just now heading into the locker room and our competitors are going in the locker room as well. So we’ll share more of our playbook in the fall. But suffice it to say, we’re coming out hot and heavy as we go into next year.

Sterling Auty – JP Morgan Chase Co

And then just a follow-up to that, I don’t know if I can ask just what is legitimate in terms of where you could take your market share? When you look at the growth on the tax category, do you think more of the growth is going to come from taking away from stores and onto desktop and online? Or is more the growth going to be just taking share within that category?

Brad Smith

Yes. Sterling, it’s going to come from a few different places. First of all, about 5 million people enter the tax category every year because they come of age, they get a job. They happen to be Millennials, the next generation, and they prefer things that happen to work on their mobile phones, their tablets and their computers. So we’ve got that benefit. The second is, if you look at the value proposition of tax software, its net promoter score, which is customer satisfaction, is 2x to 3x higher than a tax store at about 1/3 the price. So we also had a superior value prop. So ultimately over time, we’re going to be benefited by both new filers entering the category, and we plan to take share from the tax stores. And those will be the 2 major sources of growth.

Operator

Our next question comes from Ross MacMillan with Jefferies Company.

Ross MacMillan – Jefferies Company, Inc.

Brad, I wonder if you could just make some comments about, I missed the prepared remarks, about the backdrop in the SMB market. I think your own data suggests that it’s a fairly slow recovery there. You’re obviously executing well. But how are you thinking about that relative to your expectation? Is it playing out as you thought it would this year? And then I have one follow-up.

Brad Smith

Sure, Ross. Yes, nothing has really changed in terms of our outlook in the economy for small businesses. We see a modest sluggish growth. And basically, we look at a couple of factors, which lead us to that conclusion. One is the number of small businesses that are seeing an increase in total charge volume with customers shopping at their stores. And that’s a modest total volume improvement and in terms of an average volume per merchant is basically flat quarter-over-quarter. The second is the small businesses have enough confidence to hire employees, and there’s better news there. It looks like an average annual employment rise of about 3.7%. And so that’s good news. And it’s also good news that every geographic region in the country is now better than they were last year in terms of hiring employees. But at that rate, as we shared before, it’s going to take us 3.5 to 4 years to get to pre-2007 levels. So we’re seeing an improvement, but it’s a slow sluggish recovery. And the key for us is our products work in any economy. We’re there to help you save time and do more with your money. And so as long as we have a value proposition that’s working, we can continue to grow what we have despite the sluggish recovery.

Ross MacMillan – Jefferies Company, Inc.

And then just on the FI business, I think you guys have talked about that accelerating up to double-digit for some time. It still feels like we’re ways off that. What’s your perspective on that now? And kind of when do you think it’s realistic that we could get back to those levels of growth?

Brad Smith

Yes. Let me break down the Financial Services business into two key segment to answer your question, Ross. The first statement is, if you take out a onetime comparable we’re growing over the divestiture of our lending business and we also had a onetime nonrecurring item in the fourth quarter last year, the growth would have been roughly 9%, so almost close to that double-digit range. But the second is, if you look at the core business, which is consumer banking and Bill Pay, that is the future business for us. That’s growing the customer base 9% and 23% in the quarter. But about 25% of that business unit’s revenue is what we have considered non-core. It’s assets that aren’t really growing that fast, like commercial banking. And we’ve got a set of plans in place to address that as we head into the next fiscal year. So our full game plan and our expectations are that this is a double-digit growing business. We just have to continue to execute on the online banking and Bill Pay side. We have to continue to innovate with the better ease-of-use than any other alternative, and we’ve got to address these non-core assets, which we’re in the process of doing.

Operator

Our next question comes from Brad Sills of Barclays.

Bradley Sills – Barclays Capital

Hey, guys. A question on just Employee Management Group in Payroll there. Customer growth overall looks a little bit light but its online growth is strong. Are you seeing a similar shift there where your install base is moving from the desktop to online like you are in QuickBooks?

Brad Smith

Yes, Brad. We are seeing that more customers choose online versus desktop, and it’s not a shift between the 2. It’s actually new customers coming into the franchise. And you’re absolutely right. It’s modest growth. To have a plus 1% is not the kind of customer growth we expect. But if you compare that to others in the industry, it’s actually faster than others are growing. But it’s not acceptable for us. And so we’re continuing to look for ways to get more subscribers in. And our online solution seems to be the answer and that’s the one we’re leaning into.

Bradley Sills – Barclays Capital

And the other business category, QuickBooks International, Canada U.K. you mentioned that being an outperformer. What do you think was the driver there, and is that sustainable?

Brad Smith

Yes. We are seeing that the more we leverage what we’ve been able to create in the U.S. and not ask Canada and the U.K. to deal with a version that’s 2 or 3 years old but actually can get a fresher version from us, the more competitive our products are and the more our customers like them. So what you’re seeing up in Canada and the U.K. is success of QuickBooks. You’re seeing success of the online version of QuickBooks now moving into those markets. And you’re seeing the success of Mint as we took it up into Canada. And I think the same trends we’re seeing here, we’re seeing over there. And we’re excited about the future, and we’re going to continue to take some of our existing solutions into those markets.

Operator

Our next question comes from Jim MacDonald with First Analysis.

James Macdonald – First Analysis Securities Corporation

I have a question and then a follow-up. You usually talk about Homestead web hosting. Any comments on that business?

Brad Smith

Yes, Jim. It continues to do well. It’s bringing new customers into the franchise. Its customer base continue to grow. One of the things we were trying to do today is actually highlight some of the fastest-growing businesses in all the segments but not go through everything. They grew quarter-over-quarter. They grew over last year as well. And we’re also attaching our Payments product to those website customers at a healthy clip. So we’re excited about that business. It’s a new front door for our Small Business franchise, and we simply left it out because we were trying to streamline the script to get to some of the other areas.

James Macdonald – First Analysis Securities Corporation

Okay. That’s fair. And back to TurboTax, if your largest customer grew units — your largest competitor grew units faster than you did, who lost share? I mean, because it does seem like you grew units faster than the market for digital.

Brad Smith

Yes. Jim, if you break the digital category to 2 groups, you’ve got desktop software and there really only are 2 players in that game. There’s us and HR Block and that’s through retail. And then if you go to the online, there are dozens of players. Just go to irs.gov and check out the free file alliance site, you’ll see a lot of names, many of which you may not even recognize. And one of the analogies that I shared with some of the people that I had the chance to talk to is when 2 bears get to scrapping in the woods, sometimes the rabbits and squirrels get hurt. And so ultimately, it’s not a 0-sum game in the online space. And we’re able to grow share and our major competitor was able to grow share, and some of the others suffered as a result.

Operator

Our next question comes from Gil Luria with Wedbush Securities.

Gil Luria – Wedbush Securities Inc.

The fourth quarter for your taxes is not the biggest quarter. But over the last 3 years, there’s been a trend for that quarter to grow very rapidly to become a bigger piece. It’s grown 40% to 60% over the last 3 years. Can you talk about what’s caused that trend? Why are there more filings? Are you getting more revenue in that fourth quarter tax? The only reason I ask is because that’s going to be the difference between you growing 13% and 14%, which is a little bit of a difference in terms of creating a trajectory.

Brad Smith

Yes, Gil. What we’re seeing is, not only a continued trend towards procrastination, people getting closer to April 14 and 15 or this year, April 17 and 18 with the extension, but we’re also seeing more people file extensions and file their taxes later in the year. So it’s too early now for us to know because we had a nice completion to this tax season. But our anticipation is what you saw it. In the last few years, you’ve seen more and more of that business move into the fourth quarter. And so right now, we try to reflect what our best forecasts are into our fourth quarter guidance. And we’ll let you know if anything changes when we have our next earnings call.

Gil Luria – Wedbush Securities Inc.

And then the second question is also on tax. You talked a little bit about the things that helped you increase revenue per filing, free-to-paid and the mobile application, et cetera. What were some of the headwinds that you had in terms of revenue per filing that may have offset that?

R. Williams

Hey, Gil, this is Neil. Yes, I think the main thing that we face this season was really the confusion with the IRS around when you can file your return, when your refund will be delivered and when you can have your return processed. I’m not thinking of any other systemic issues that really caused us a problem, either with unit growth or with monetization this year. I think the first quarter just had a lot of confusion about when can I get my return filed and when will the IRS process it.

Operator

Our next question comes from Scott Schneeberger with Oppenheimer.

Scott Schneeberger – Oppenheimer Co. Inc.

On tax, Brad, you mentioned, obviously, yet another good year for digital growth. But certainly, storefront grew many times faster than it has in a long, long time. Could you just address what you think is driving that and how that may affect you going forward? Is that a sustainable dynamic, whatever it is that is driving it?

Brad Smith

Yes, I’d be happy to, Scott. I’d say first and foremost, tax stores this year advertised quite a bit. They were fighting amongst themselves, and there was a period of time in the early calendar year when you turn on the TV and there are 4 or 5 commercials in a row. And they were all the competitors and tax stores competing with each other. And so they created some awareness for that category. The second is, they got pretty aggressive. Many of them offered free easy returns in a bricks and mortar tax store with some pretty heavy human capital as a cost structure. And I think they drove some traffic into the store, and I think that we’re going to grab the backs on their part to get the franchises growing. Ultimately though, as you said, they grew many times faster than they have in the past. And if you actually measured on a per return basis, you have — I’ll have to go back and look at what the public records are. But it looks like we’re talking about some single-digit growth there in terms of tax stores and it’s not growing nearly as fast as digital. So ultimately, I think our long-term game plan is to rise the secular trend — the tailwinds of demographic and technology changes to continue to leverage the fact that we have a better value proposition that customers prefer over tax stores and that’s measured by net promoter and the fact that it’s 1/3 the price of going to a tax store to get your taxes done. And so ultimately, I think that’s what’s going to benefit us in the long term, and that’s all we need.

Scott Schneeberger – Oppenheimer Co. Inc.

And then just asking an earlier question in a different way, what are the areas that you’re competing obviously is against the tax stores. But then there’s pencil and paper and we’re familiar there were no forms offered this year. Could you just address what is left of that market to be grabbed and meaning pure pencil and paper? And how many more years is that a viable target for you?

Brad Smith

Yes, Scott. It looks like from the IRS data that’s been published that, that category, which is paper and pencil went down about 25%, 26% year-over-year, that leads single-digit millions. I don’t know the exact number. We’ll have to wait until the end of the calendar year to see what late filings and other things produce. And so ultimately, at the end of the day, it’s probably a couple of years less than that, although those are the hardest customers to blow out of the rut. So they may hang on a little longer, but that’s not really where the game is. The game is us making sure we prove that we have a better value prop than tax stores. And the fact that we have CPAs using our ProSeries and Lacerte products, if you want to go to somebody, you should go to a CPA, and we’re happy for you to go there as well. And that’s ultimately the opportunity that we see.

Scott Schneeberger – Oppenheimer Co. Inc.

And one quickie final one. Were there any technology issues at all this year with regard to TurboTax early-season, late-season or was it clean?

R. Williams

No, there were not, no technology issues related to our performance this year.

Operator

Our next question comes from Kartik Mehta with North coast.

Kartik Mehta – Northcoast Research

Brad, I just wanted to follow up a little bit on the paper and pencil issue you started discussing. I’m wondering if you could talk about maybe how much benefit you got from the fact that the buyers did not send out forms this year, and as you said, there was such a huge decline in paper and pencil.

Brad Smith

Yes, I think that we benefited as did the other software players in the market, the digital category benefited the most. And I think at the end of the day, we’ll have to wait until the Investor Day to break out exactly what our sources of customers were. But there definitely was a tailwind as those forms didn’t go out and people looked for an easy solution to file their taxes. And so they went online and filed it with us.

Kartik Mehta – Northcoast Research

Okay. And then moving on to the Merchant business, more than likely the Durbin Amendment goes into effect maybe in July this year. Obviously, there’s an opportunity for processors to maybe make margin and revenue on this. And I’m wondering what Intuit’s strategy will be for that business as it relates to the Durbin Amendment.

Brad Smith

Yes. We want to wait and see how the dust settles around the Durbin Amendment before we are clear about what’s the right thing to do to help customers and also continue to grow our business. So if you don’t mind, we’ll wait until all of that’s been worked out and then we’ll more than happy to share with you when we do our next earnings call and going to Investor Day what our game plan is to deal with the consequences.

Operator

Our next question comes from Bryan Keane with Crédit Suisse.

Bryan Keane – Crédit Suisse AG

A lot of my questions have been asked and answered. I just — a couple of clarifications. The self prep market group over the last 5 years has grown about 7%. And looking at the IRS data, it looks like it’s going to grow at about 11% or 12% this year, so a significant acceleration. Is that all due to the reduction in paper returns? Any else driving that number?

Brad Smith

Yes. Bryan, first of all, the IRS report you see, you’ll have to adjust that over time because there’s people who will actually buy software and print it out and mail it in paper-wise and then others will send it electronically. So it’s not really an apples-and-apples comparison. You’re right, the digital category’s grown about 7% and the current IRS report suggests in terms of total returns that came in about 11%. I go back to the fact that I think it’s new filers entering the category who prefer digital solutions. It’s the fact that the manual forms were no longer available and so people actually chose to go online to do that. And then ultimately, our category benefited from both of those and grew, I think those were probably the 2 biggest catalysts that drove the digital growth this year.

Bryan Keane – Crédit Suisse AG

Okay. Because the concern would be if a lot of the growth came from the manual forms not being sent out, then that gave the category huge boost this year, which will create tough comps for next year.

Brad Smith

Yes. We would say to you that we feel pretty good about looking into next year. And when we get to our August earnings call, we’ll provide our guidance. And we feel like that we’re going to see the same thing continue, which is the digital category growing faster than the other alternatives with or without manual filers in the market. And we’re going to continue to take share of our revenue per return, but I appreciate the question.

Bryan Keane – Crédit Suisse AG

Yes, no, just looking at it. And then just two quick ones. In your quotes in the press release, you said in a particularly competitive tax season, what exactly did you mean by that?

Brad Smith

That we saw aggressive advertising for some of our major competitors as we have been out there in the market doing. We saw not only us and another competitor going free, but we had our other major competitor get out there and lead with free. And I think at the end of the day, the good news was it created so much awareness around the digital category that the category grew. And that we are able to hold our own and continue to gain share for the fourth year in a row. So I think it was just a pretty competitive year. And quite frankly, competition is good because it gets more people aware of the solutions and then the best — and the best company is going to win, and we want to try to be the best company.

Bryan Keane – Crédit Suisse AG

Okay and then just last question for me, Neil. If you look at — a lot of times, everybody will compare the units to revenue. And the delta on Consumer Tax was about 4 to 5 points last year. This year, it looks like it was about 2 points. Is that difference just in mix? Or is it the cross-sell and trying to get people from free to paid? What’s that — what makes that difference this year versus last?

R. Williams

The biggest driver, Bryan, really, is people that are choosing the online services that are typically a higher ASP and that are also attach more services to it. So the goal is still long term to drive customers in and monetize them, focused on lifetime value. But we are seeing a favorable mix change.

Operator

Next on the line is Laura Lederman with William Blair.

Justin Furby

It’s actually Justin in for Laura. Thanks for taking my questions. I guess, Brad, you called out some recent successes in the U.K., Singapore, and then I think you’ve been in the market in Canada with Mint for a couple of quarters now. If you look out to the next year, maybe the next few quarters, what are some logical extensions and other geographies that you’re looking at? And then if you think about sort of your 2015 scenario, how much of your revenue in theory could be from the International mix, because obviously it’s still a fairly small piece of your overall business?

Brad Smith

Yes, Justin. So in terms of the geographies, Canada and the U.K. are 2 markets we’ve been in and we continue to expand our product portfolio there. We are also in Singapore with QuickBooks Online. As you know, we’re in India as the largest emerging economy. And we’ve got several experiments going on in that market as we speak. We’re also doing some early investigation in Australia and New Zealand. We work with a licensee in that market for a Small Business suite, and we’ve been testing whether or not it makes sense to take Mint and some other offerings there. And if you had to kind of say, “Well, what’s the logic behind that?” If you think about the Commonwealth countries, those who tend to be English-speaking, share similarities on things like how they look at accounting and value-added tax. Those are the markets that we think are short-term opportunities for us. And of course, we’re invested in the long term in India and some of the larger emerging economies as we’re running experiments to see if we can find a way to grow in those markets as well. In terms of our goal between now and 2015, we haven’t put a number out there other than to say we recognize we need to be a global company at a global economy. And we’re committed to continuing to grow our percent of revenue coming from outside the U.S. over the years to come.

Justin Furby

Okay. And then if you think about your plan in the MA market, I mean, if you think about any potential deals, would it more than likely be another type SaaS acquisition, so a Medfusion type of a scenario? Or just curious on what you’re seeing in the MA market in general.

Brad Smith

Yes. So Justin, what we tend to do is look for talent and technology tuck-ins, businesses that will accelerate either our technology platforms with SaaS offerings, like Mint did with Quicken or PayCycle did with our Payroll product or Medfusion did to help us get into the patient-to-provider portal safe. Or we love for these startups to have really good talent that understand things, like mobile developments and tablet development, and they tend to be around our core businesses. They tend to be nice adjacencies. And so you’ll see us continuing to look in spaces like Small Business in the front office area to help people get customers and retain their customers. You’ll also see us looking at attached services for things like Payroll, and we may be looking outside the U.S. as well as a way to accelerate our progress outside on the global front as well.

Justin Furby

Okay. And then one, you talked a little bit about the market dynamic in sort of just a slow continual improvement. I mean, if you think about just taking the first 3 quarters of this year, in a different market, in a more improving market, what would that — so you’ve obviously taken your Small Business Group and you’re double digits here in the 13% range. In a much better environment, what could that look like?

Brad Smith

I can’t wait to find out. Honestly, Justin, it’s hard to call. I’ll have to wait and see as the market starts to recover. And I don’t mean to be flip about it, but we’re going to continue to improve our game. And as the economy gets better, I can’t wait to test how high is high as a company.

Operator

Next on line, we have Michael Millman with Millman Research.

Michael Millman – Millman Research Associates

Some more on the tax. Maybe looking at some different numbers, but it looks like with the e-file that both ERO and digital grew about the same, 12%. So I was wondering if you think that’s a onetime based upon a lot of the things that’s been said. Sort of related, it also looks like the amount of returns that were done off digital has seemingly gotten much closer to the digital sales. And so the question is, to what extent has some of your growth been related to converting from your own desktop to online? And then Block did very well this year, obviously, off a low base. But could you talk about — a little bit about what they did differently and where you think that takes them in the future and maybe throw in tax act on that as well.

Brad Smith

Hey, Michael, I’ll try to take those one at a time. On the first one, I know we’re all looking at a report the IRS puts out. I think the last one they sent out was through the end of season, maybe early May. The important thing is to look at the total number of tax returns filed, which the report suggests is about 1.5%. What you see underneath that is some big shift towards electronic filing, whether it came in through a tax store, a pro, a CPA or digital. And remember, this year, the IRS really pushed hard to get people to electronically send in their tax returns if you’re a tax preparer. So a lot of that is mix shift, where people who went to a tax store or went to a CPA, who historically might have mailed it in, the IRS encouraged them strongly to electronically send that in and, in many cases, required it. So what you basically see is at that 1% growth, there was just greater mix of the number of people who electronically filed. And ultimately, I think that’s why you see the numbers of 12% and 12% between the 2 groups. When you look at the last 6 to 7 years, you can see that the digital category in terms of the number of people filing returns has been growing 2x to 3x faster than those other alternatives. And that’s really what we look at. And once we did get the final IRS numbers, we’ll break that all down for you and we’ll share it you — share it with you. But net-net, I think that’s why you see 12% and 12% right now is the mandates from the IRS to get tax preparers to send things in electronically.

Michael Millman – Millman Research Associates

So you think this is just a 1-year phenomenon?

Brad Smith

Well, I actually think that you’re going to see a continuing shift to digital tax prep. I think in terms of the number of tax returns that got e-filed to the IRS, I think you’re seeing some things happen this year as the IRS encouraged the tax preparers and those people who file taxes for their neighbors to send it in electronically. So you’re seeing that show up in the tax professionals line. Let me move to the second question. And the second question for you, I believe, was around Block?

Michael Millman – Millman Research Associates

I guess there were 2 questions. One, that was the third question. The second question was that the Desktop, if you just look at you and Block, it looked like it was more on the order of one return per desktop as opposed to historically double that. And so a, is that what you’re seeing? And b, does that suggest — or to what extent historically has your own online been taken from your desktop? And if we’re now getting to one and one, what does that suggest going forward?

Brad Smith

I see. So right now, we’re still seeing an average of about 2.1 returns for every desktop unit we sell. And it’s one for one as you just suggested online. In terms of shifting from TurboTax online– or to TurboTax Online from Desktop, we’re seeing very little cannibalization of existing Desktop customers. That’s why the base remains relatively stable year-over-year, but it’s the new customers coming into the franchise that are choosing online, that’s causing online to grow 18%. So we don’t see a shift between customers. We do think new customers choosing online. And in terms of the returns per unit, it’s still about 2 for every desktop unit and its one for one online.

Michael Millman – Millman Research Associates

Okay. Well, I might have to get back to you because the numbers will be a problem with those numbers. And the other question was the Block question. What did they do differently? What does that suggest for the future?

Brad Smith

Yes, I think we clearly have a kind of respect for Block, for TaxACT, for all the competitors. What we saw this year out of Block was the same thing I think the market saw. They were out there advertising aggressively. They advertised both the tax stores and the digital category. Thank goodness they advertised the digital category because that added their voice to ours and that helped grow the total category, which is good news for everybody. In terms of other things they did, they offered the free easy return to get people to come into the stores, and that helped them drive store traffic. And I think their commitment, from the things I read publicly, is they’re going to find ways to monetize those customers in future years. We’re going to find ways to try to get those customers into the digital category, so we’ll have to see how that all plays out. In terms of TaxACT, we’ve got data that suggests that this was not a great year for them. But that’s our internal data, so we’ll have to wait and see when they come out and talk about the run results or after the HR Block and TaxACT thing plays out, what’s said about them overall. But I think net-net, Block did well, we did well and I think some of the others had a little bit of a tougher year.

Operator

And our final question comes from Yun Kim with Gleacher Company.

Yun Kim – Gleacher Company, Inc.

So just comparing the growth dynamics of Payroll and Payment business segments, it looks like you have done a tremendous job of attracting new merchants for a Payment business. But I think you put it out before in a call that the number of Payroll customers having really, really flat or 1% growth for a while. What exactly is the difference between the 2 markets? Is one completely a high end one, the other low end? Or is there a way to be more aggressive on pricing? Because I do remember a couple of years ago, the growth in payroll was driven by pricing increase. And then just quickly how much of your Payroll business right now is online-driven?

R. Williams

This is Neil. That’s a great question. And there are 2 very different customer segments that are driving growth in this case. In the case of Payments, as we talked about in the call, you’re seeing GoPayments and you’re seeing our Website business be a great front door for us but tend to be very small businesses, businesses that are just getting started, just getting formed. Clearly, you don’t need a Payroll product until you’re much further along and you’re actually adding employees. So we tend to see an opportunity for our Payroll solutions much earlier in the life cycle of a small business than we do Payroll. So it’s a little later in an organization’s maturity level and formation to come in on the Payroll side. And as Brad mentioned earlier, clearly, we’d like to see customers growing much faster than 1%. But at the same time, that compares very favorably to what we’re seeing with other competitors in the marketplace. So given the environment we’re in, we think that’s pretty respectful, and our retention rate remains very, very high in the Payroll business. But it is a different customer set and a different life cycle point when they’re open to our services.

Yun Kim – Gleacher Company, Inc.

What is the attach rate of the Payroll product for your enterprise, QuickBooks enterprise customers? Because you’re seeing pretty good growth out of that group.

R. Williams

Yes, we really haven’t talked about the attach rates externally. Clearly, enterprise customers are more mature and later in their life cycles, so they’re a much better prospect for Payroll. But we haven’t talked about the attach rates.

Yun Kim – Gleacher Company, Inc.

Okay. Great. And then just shifting gear to the Mint.com overall, can you just make comments about how that business is progressing and officially in terms of innovating with your other products, such as TurboTax and whatnot?

Brad Smith

Sure. This is Brad, I’d love to do that. When we made the acquisition of Mint.com, they had about 1.5 million users. They’re now in the neighborhood of 6 million users in just about 18 months, so they’ve really accelerated their growth rate. If you look at the average revenue per user, which you know the customer doesn’t pay anything for, this is actually a lead generation model, where others pay up to be able to provide value to those end-users, we’re still holding strong in that $12 to $16 range against — depending upon seasonality. We’re excited about Mint. You heard us talk about the fact we’ve taken it outside the U.S. into Canada. The early result in Canada are actually outperforming the same amount of time when it was in the U.S. So we like those results, and so we’re looking at other countries. We had a good season this year where we had TurboTax customers able to sign up for Mint and vice versa. So we got some good synergy there. And more importantly, we also have the Mint team teaching the rest of the organization to introduce a similar monetization model in their products. We call it the ways-to-save engine. So net-net, the Mint success story continues. We’re excited about that opportunity, and we’re going to continue to push it as we move to the future.

Operator

And gentlemen, would you like to proceed with any additional remarks?

Brad Smith

Yes, I just want to thank everybody. I know that this season, there was a lot of moving parts. You have a lot of complexity, and the year shifts between quarters, delayed processing. You’ve got data out there from competitors. You’ve got our data. You’ve got the IRS and everybody’s trying to make heads or tails out of it.

Let me just ask you to keep this in perspective. Our company this year continued to grow. We grew our customer bases. We gained market share. We were able to grow our revenue. We’ve adjusted our guidance to the high end of our guidance range, and we’re feeling good because we have the secular shifts at our back. And so I hope that the story today helped reinforce the message we’ve been telling you, and we’re looking forward to seeing you again when we’re out on the road or when we talk to you in the next earnings call. So thanks a lot for your questions today, and we’ll speak with you soon.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating. This concludes today’s conference call.