Pay Per Call Advertising, Marketing & Affiliate Education.

Category: News (page 10 of 1505)

Cheaper Clicks from AdWords Coming?

Google’s average revenue per click from AdWords’ advertisers dropped for the first time in two years for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2011, according to Reuters. Analysts projected a 3 percent increase in cost-per-click revenue, but Google reported an 8 percent decrease.

As a result, many advertisers are wondering (a) if this is merely a blip or the beginning of a new trend, and (b) if they can lower their pay-per-click advertising costs.

Lower CPC Rates: A Blip or a Trend?

According to Reuters, “Google executives blamed the decline in search ad rates on forex [foreign exchange] fluctuations and ad format changes, but analysts wondered whether mobile advertising — which has lower rates — played a more important role than the company admitted.”

Another interesting theory comes from MarketWatch contributor Nigam Arora, who wrote that “ecosystems built by Amazon, Apple, and Facebook are the reasons behind the big decline in cost-per-click.”

I suspect the answer involves both of those causes. Innovations in mobile marketing, social advertising, and ecommerce marketplace strategies are resulting in more choices for shoppers and online retailers alike.

I envision a dynamic where more shoppers click on mobile ads — which garner lower cost-per-click prices — and online advertisers pay less for AdWords’ clicks as they experiment with alternate sources of revenue, such as new online marketplaces.

I believe last quarter’s drop in cost-per-click rates was indeed a blip. But as shoppers use mobile phones, rely on social media to decide what to buy, and buy through online marketplaces, we’ll see more unpredictable blips like this. Online shopping behavior is changing, and so too will online advertising, as retailers adapt.

How to Reduce CPC Rates

So, how can advertisers take advantage of blips that result from shoppers evaluating new ways to shop online?

The answer is to stay engaged in the management of your pay-per-click campaigns, or to ensure that your pay-per-click managers continue to experiment with new strategies. Google has released many new experiments and enhancements to AdWords — such as “Product listing ads” and “Click-to-Call” — and by experimenting with these new features, advertisers may find sources for cheaper, more profitable clicks.

Fortunately for diligent merchants, most online retailers treat their pay-per-click campaigns as afterthoughts. This produces time-limited opportunities for well-managed campaigns to lower their per-click costs. Here are three examples.

  • Mobile segmentation. My firm audits hundreds of PPC campaigns each year. Many retailers still bid for mobile and desktop clicks from within the same campaign. This is usually not ideal.

    First, if your site isn’t mobile friendly, you may be wasting money on the clicks you receive from mobile devices. If that’s the case, turn mobile ads off. Second, if your site is mobile friendly, take advantage of that by establishing a budget and bidding strategy that is optimized specifically for mobile. You can also craft your ad copy to indicate to shoppers that your site will be compatible with their mobile device. Often, you’ll be able to secure a lower cost per click for your mobile ads than your traditional ads.

    In the first case, you’ll be making your campaigns more profitable. In the second, you’ll be targeting mobile buyers more aggressively than many of your competitors as you take advantage of a new source of cheaper clicks.

  • Product listing ads. Product listing ads enable you to promote specific products from your site on top of the Google search results page. You pay either a cost per click or a cost per acquisition. A shopper searching for “computer mouses,” for example, might see specific products from your site on the top of the page, as shown in the example below.

    Shoppers like these ad formats, and they click on them at a high rate. That, combined with the likelihood that shoppers will find the landing page on your site highly relevant, can lead to a high quality score. Since ads with high quality scores are eligible for lower per-click costs, you have an opportunity to get more quality clicks at a lower cost per click.

    As more online retailers take advantage of product listing ads, the ability to buy these clicks at a lower cost than standard ads may decrease. For now, however, it’s worth taking advantage of.

Enlarge This Image

  • Click-to-call. If you’re equipped to accept calls from shoppers and convert them into sales, click-to-call could work very well. At first, you pay a capped rate of $1 per click each time a shopper searches Google and clicks to call you from your ad rather than visit your web page. But experimenting with click-to-call makes sense, especially for online retailers that sell high-ticket items. And if the call lasts fewer than 60 seconds, you pay nothing.

Conclusion

Mobile, social, and new online marketplaces will impact how people shop online. Google’s AdWords team continually evolves its products to keep up with these changes. For advertisers, staying abreast of these new products can be daunting. The benefit to experimenting with them, however, is to find time-limited opportunities to get valuable clicks and sales at a much lower per-click cost than your standard campaigns.

Scott Smigler’s profile.

Read More

Cheaper Clicks from AdWords Coming?

Google’s average revenue per click from AdWords’ advertisers dropped for the first time in two years for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2011, according to Reuters. Analysts projected a 3 percent increase in cost-per-click revenue, but Google reported an 8 percent decrease.

As a result, many advertisers are wondering (a) if this is merely a blip or the beginning of a new trend, and (b) if they can lower their pay-per-click advertising costs.

Lower CPC Rates: A Blip or a Trend?

According to Reuters, “Google executives blamed the decline in search ad rates on forex [foreign exchange] fluctuations and ad format changes, but analysts wondered whether mobile advertising — which has lower rates — played a more important role than the company admitted.”

Another interesting theory comes from MarketWatch contributor Nigam Arora, who wrote that “ecosystems built by Amazon, Apple, and Facebook are the reasons behind the big decline in cost-per-click.”

I suspect the answer involves both of those causes. Innovations in mobile marketing, social advertising, and ecommerce marketplace strategies are resulting in more choices for shoppers and online retailers alike.

I envision a dynamic where more shoppers click on mobile ads — which garner lower cost-per-click prices — and online advertisers pay less for AdWords’ clicks as they experiment with alternate sources of revenue, such as new online marketplaces.

I believe last quarter’s drop in cost-per-click rates was indeed a blip. But as shoppers use mobile phones, rely on social media to decide what to buy, and buy through online marketplaces, we’ll see more unpredictable blips like this. Online shopping behavior is changing, and so too will online advertising, as retailers adapt.

How to Reduce CPC Rates

So, how can advertisers take advantage of blips that result from shoppers evaluating new ways to shop online?

The answer is to stay engaged in the management of your pay-per-click campaigns, or to ensure that your pay-per-click managers continue to experiment with new strategies. Google has released many new experiments and enhancements to AdWords — such as “Product listing ads” and “Click-to-Call” — and by experimenting with these new features, advertisers may find sources for cheaper, more profitable clicks.

Fortunately for diligent merchants, most online retailers treat their pay-per-click campaigns as afterthoughts. This produces time-limited opportunities for well-managed campaigns to lower their per-click costs. Here are three examples.

  • Mobile segmentation. My firm audits hundreds of PPC campaigns each year. Many retailers still bid for mobile and desktop clicks from within the same campaign. This is usually not ideal.

    First, if your site isn’t mobile friendly, you may be wasting money on the clicks you receive from mobile devices. If that’s the case, turn mobile ads off. Second, if your site is mobile friendly, take advantage of that by establishing a budget and bidding strategy that is optimized specifically for mobile. You can also craft your ad copy to indicate to shoppers that your site will be compatible with their mobile device. Often, you’ll be able to secure a lower cost per click for your mobile ads than your traditional ads.

    In the first case, you’ll be making your campaigns more profitable. In the second, you’ll be targeting mobile buyers more aggressively than many of your competitors as you take advantage of a new source of cheaper clicks.

  • Product listing ads. Product listing ads enable you to promote specific products from your site on top of the Google search results page. You pay either a cost per click or a cost per acquisition. A shopper searching for “computer mouses,” for example, might see specific products from your site on the top of the page, as shown in the example below.

    Shoppers like these ad formats, and they click on them at a high rate. That, combined with the likelihood that shoppers will find the landing page on your site highly relevant, can lead to a high quality score. Since ads with high quality scores are eligible for lower per-click costs, you have an opportunity to get more quality clicks at a lower cost per click.

    As more online retailers take advantage of product listing ads, the ability to buy these clicks at a lower cost than standard ads may decrease. For now, however, it’s worth taking advantage of.

Enlarge This Image

  • Click-to-call. If you’re equipped to accept calls from shoppers and convert them into sales, click-to-call could work very well. At first, you pay a capped rate of $1 per click each time a shopper searches Google and clicks to call you from your ad rather than visit your web page. But experimenting with click-to-call makes sense, especially for online retailers that sell high-ticket items. And if the call lasts fewer than 60 seconds, you pay nothing.

Conclusion

Mobile, social, and new online marketplaces will impact how people shop online. Google’s AdWords team continually evolves its products to keep up with these changes. For advertisers, staying abreast of these new products can be daunting. The benefit to experimenting with them, however, is to find time-limited opportunities to get valuable clicks and sales at a much lower per-click cost than your standard campaigns.

Scott Smigler’s profile.

Read More

Real Estate Online Marketing – Social Ads vs Banner Ads

Back At You reviews the state of the ad market for small business. Analyzing the effectiveness of Social ads vs banner ads.

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) January 31, 2012

Back At You, a social media marketing company focused on creating and executing online marketing strategies for small businesses, reviews the state of online advertising as it pertains to small business and, in particular, the Real Estate industry.

The Real Estate industry is playing catch up when it comes to technology and online marketing. Like most small businesses, Real Estate professionals are focused on marketing methods of the past. These methods are usually highly competitive, expensive and not very effective, especially when compared to when they were first introduced. For example, ads in the local newspaper, at the bus stop or in the grocery cart, these were all very effective when first started. However, like all marketing channels, change is required to maintain an ad’s effectiveness. Unfortunately, these same channels today are exactly the same as they were 30 years ago.

Fast forward to the Internet. Banner ads are the rage of advertising. Real Estate professionals who were the early movers experienced great success with this new way to advertise. As ad networks became smarter with better targeting, banner ads started to replace traditional advertising. Many of the Real Estate professionals who were the early adopters became the industry’s top sellers of property.

Now 15 years or so later, banner ads are being ignored. Consumers have been flooded with ads over the years and have built up immunity. Today, for an ad to be effective, it not only has to have a good call to action and look sleek, but also it takes multiple viewings of an ad before anyone will click. Meaning, you have to spend a lot of money on design and buying ads in bulk. Even then, it’s a tough sell for most.

Today, Social ads are what banner ads were 15 years ago and newspaper ads 30 years ago. Social ads are refreshing, engaging and encourage a call to action by the consumer to engage with your business. According to Wikipedia, Social advertising is the first form of advertising that leverages “offline” dynamics, or social influence. Facebook is a great example of where businesses can leverage a social platform and target people according to their stated interests and actions. Imagine targeting people to “Like” your Page that are interested in real estate, or are following similar businesses as your own, or have stated they are interested in buying a home or investing in real estate. All of this is possible through Social ads. Facebook is the dominant social network allowing for this rich base of data to be mined through targeted Social ads. Real Estate professionals have a significant opportunity to build a targeted base of customers using Social ads and over time, will likely never need to pay for advertising again.

Research conducted by Ignite Social Media looking at the effectiveness of Social ads vs traditional banner ads was quite conclusive. It demonstrated that social ads attracted 5.7x more visitors than display ads, cost per visitor was less expensive, bounce rates were half and customer conversations occurred 4.0x more. Consumers are becoming more savvy and have a shorter attention span than ever. Thus, engagement becomes important when marketing online.

Researched conducted by Pilot, who surveyed over 200 marketing professionals, asked how satisfied they were with their Social advertising. Only 1% said they were not satisfied. Meaning 99% said they were somewhat to very satisfied. These are professional marketers, so Real Estate agents and other small businesses, take note, Social advertising is going to be the greatest marketing channel to build a pipeline of customers for the long term.

Refining the digital newspaper model

Let’s come back to the business model question. My 15 January column featuring a simple model for digital newspapers triggered a number of emails and comments, many questioning my assumptions (my thanks to readers of the Monday Note who take the time to make insightful contributions to the discussion).

Let’s see if we can sort through the questions and come up with a few helpful answers.

1 Advertising revenue
. Let me set the backdrop here. My model projects what I’ll call a mature market. First and foremost, time spent v ad spending for print, web and mobile, which currently looks look this …

Source: Internet Trends, Mary Meeker, KPCB Oct 2011

… will have morphed into a graph showing more balance between categories. In my projections, ad spending converges to time effectively spent on various medias. Also, we’ll see a sharp rise of the mobile segment, and a sub-segment made by tablets will carry its specific business model (apps, subscription, ads).
This will happen at the expense of the print media, a sector that, considering the time people now spend on it, is still vastly over-invested. Dailies are bound to suffer more than weeklies (or Sunday editions) because their primary function (delivering news) collides with mobile devices. Having said that, newspapers will survive (after further shrinkage) thanks to an unabated base of loyal readers ready to pay almost any price for their favorite daily. This is the rationale behind recent price hikes (see Cracking the Paywall). In Europe, I see all quality papers priced at 2€ within two to three years and I don’t believe such prices will accelerate reader depletion. Holding print prices up might be critical for survival.

On this topic, this is the email I received from Jim Moroney, publisher and CEO of the Dallas Morning News:

On May 1, 2009, The Dallas Morning News raised home delivery rates across the board by 40%. The price increase was even greater for the most geographically distant delivery. We doubled daily single copy price to $1.00 and Sunday single copy price to $3.00 in two steps each. Today we yield 93% of our retail rate, i.e., we are doing very little discounting. Lots of papers claiming to raise their home delivery rates and then turnaround and offer discount after discount. If the most valuable asset we have is the content we originate, as an industry, why do we keep deeply discounting it as if it were damaged goods? Our home delivery rate is $36.95 per month, making it the third highest priced metro in the U.S. after NYT and Boston Globe.

In March, we made all access to what we distribute digitally paid access.
Website, iPad and smartphone are $9.99 each per month. All digital access is $16.95 per month. So there is a lowly metro doing something akin to the NYT and FT.

Also, because of its unique advertising value proposition, I won’t sell short print media. In a nutshell, no one expects a Dior campaign to look as gorgeous on the screen of a computer or on the four-inches display of a smartphone as it does on quality print. For such high-priced ads, print is likely to remain vastly superior for a long time – and should therefore be part of any well-rounded business strategy.

Coming back to digital media, in my view, a mature market also means a clean one. Today, many news websites URLs have very little to do with editorial. In places, the number of URLs whose only purpose is to gather “eyeballs” represents as much as 30% to 40% of all page views. Look at what Le Monde does: when you look at a web page through Readability (an app that basically extracts relevant text), you see every verb appear in red and linking to… Le Monde’s grammar conjugation service:

That’s good for SEO shenanigans. Nothing is too petty to churn audience numbers (and Le Monde is no worse than its competitors)

To sum up, here is why I think prices on the internet are likely to go up in a near (2-3 years) future :

• A cleaner internet will yield a much better performance advertising-wise than it does today,
• I nventories will have to be limited (read: closed down). No market whatsoever can withstand the type of unlimited supply we see today on the web. In our current oversupply situation, we often see more than half of the pages sold for a CPM below one dollar or euro,
• As discussed before, we can expect a strong adjustment on ad spending vs. time spent, it will benefit digital media,
• The ad market suffers greatly from current economic conditions (debt, political tensions abroad, elections in several countries, uncertainties everywhere …) Those won’t last forever.

My mention of a $20 CPM sounded overly optimistic to many readers? It is by today’s standards. But once a number of adverse factors are attended to, I think the $20 assumption will hold (and, by the way, I’m referring to revenue per page, not per module).

2 Subscription revenue. Many are challenging my 10% transformation rate (one reader out of 10 is willing to pay $10 a month in my model.) Objection taken. Again, my projections go beyond today’s deflated market. It will take a while to get to 10% when a large site such as the New York Times is at 1% or 2%. And converting readers to pay something/somehow will require imagination beyond single pricing; I’m told large newspapers charging $15 or $25 a month are considering low-cost subscriptions plans as low as $5 per month to capture young readers and boost their conversion rate. From an editorial product perspective though, I’m a bit skeptical. What will such a downgraded offer look like: stricter paywall; low-cost apps?

3 Mobile apps.
Although I explored this issue in previous Monday Notes (see The Capsule’s Price and Mobile First, and a Mag), I should have been more forthcoming about mobile apps. My belief is this: overtime, thanks their greater ability to carry subscriptions and high yield ads, apps, not web sites, will be the path to decent ARPUs.

I will acknowledge another misconception in my plans and leave it to Vin Crosbie, new media professor at the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University, New York, who commented my piece in the Guardian.

Here’s the crux: Even if Federic’s model could work for a national daily, will it scale to work for the average newspaper? Maybe NYT, WSJ, or USAToday could eek out 2% profit margin using it, but what of the other 1,412 daily newspapers in the U.S., the average-sized of which is 18,000 daily circulation? Do the math. […] Look at the paltry signup rate NYT has achieved. Scaled to a 18,000 circulation daily, NYT’s results would mean less than 180 paying online subscribers.

Vin is basically right. One of the tragedies of the digital media model is this: unlike the newspaper model, it doesn’t scale down well. There are plenty of local web sites faring well, but none comes close to supporting a 200 staff newsroom costing $25 or $27 million to operate.

frederic.filloux@mondaynote.com

Gannett’s CEO Discusses Q4 2011 Results – Earnings Call Transcript

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And we’ll go first to Alexia Quadrani from JPMorgan.

Alexia S. Quadrani – JP Morgan Chase Co, Research Division

Can you just give us a bit of color, if you can, on how we should be viewing newspaper publishing expenses for 2012? And then with your debt so low, your leverage ratio so low, really if you can review your priorities for cash this year.

Gracia C. Martore

Thanks for the question, Alexia. As we indicated at UBS, we provided some assumptions with regard to expenses across our various segments. I’d say that starting off the year, it’s very early in the year but frankly, I think we’ve gotten off to a very solid start across all of our business segments including Publishing. We’ll provide some additional color since we’ll be a little further along in the quarter at our Investor Day on February 22. I think the second part of your question related to the fact that we generate an enormous amount of free cash flow on a very consistent basis. And as we’ve talked about in the past, we obviously want to make sure that we have the flexibility to invest in those products and investments that make sense to the future growth of our company. As well, we have focused certainly in the past year on returning additional capital to shareholders. For those of you who don’t follow us as closely as other folks, in July we doubled our dividend and we reinstituted our share buyback program and said we’d buy back about $100 million of shares over the next 12 months. When we — however, when we announced those actions, we did remind people that, that was just merely a first step and frankly, a good first step, given the very difficult economic backdrop we saw during the course of the summer. We also reminded everyone that the board will continually reassess these actions depending on economic and market conditions. So we’re going to evaluate — we’re going to continue to evaluate our capital allocation in that context of delivering increasing value to shareholders while preserving our financial flexibility, and we’ll look forward to providing greater detail on our capital allocation plans on the 22nd.

Operator

Next, we’ll go to Craig Huber with Huber Research Partners.

Craig A. Huber – Access 3:42, LLC

Craig Huber here. Can you give us a little sense on how December went for the newspapers? If I recall correctly I think your December media conference, you said October, November were down a combined 5.5%. What was December like? And then can you also speak a little further about January, if you would, please.

Gracia C. Martore

Yes, I think taking the latter part of it first while Paul is looking at the monthly numbers. As I said, we are getting off to a very solid start in the first quarter. We are anticipating some good feedback in the broadcast side of the business where we obviously have the Super Bowl on our NBC affiliates. We’ve also enjoyed some political spending from the primaries that have already taken place in South Carolina, and that is going to take place in Florida, I guess, tomorrow. And so we’re nicely on track from that perspective. With regard to specifics on the quarter, I think as I mentioned, November was the best month of the quarter as we shared, and as we said at UBS, a month does not a trend make. We’ve seen some volatility in our — as I addressed in my remarks. December, on a retail basis, was I think impacted by the fact that consumer spending around the holidays seemed to slow after the initial excitement around the Black Friday, Cyber Monday activities. We also, as I mentioned, were impacted by the fact that Christmas fell on that last Sunday, and that obviously had an impact on preprint. So I’d say that December was stronger than certainly third quarter and earlier in the fourth quarter, but not quite as strong as the November comparisons.

Operator

Next we’ll hear from Doug Arthur, Evercore.

Douglas M. Arthur – Evercore Partners Inc., Research Division

Gracia, can you make any forward comments on retransmission revenue growth prospects in 2012? And then just as a follow-up, a small item, but it looks like Captivate had a pretty tough quarter. Can you comment?

Gracia C. Martore

Sure. Let me start with retrans. We indicated at UBS that we are looking at about $90 million of retrans revenues for 2012. We didn’t have any major agreements that came up this year. We are looking at a couple of large deals that will come up at the end of 2012. And so that $90 million or so is about a 13% increase over what we achieved in 2011. We expect frankly that retrans is going to continue to grow because, frankly, our percentage of subscribers’ fees is still well below what we believe is our percentage of the audience on the cable and satellite systems. We think the pie is going to continue to grow, and we’re going to be the beneficiary of that in a meaningful way. As to Captivate, I think you’re right on track. Captivate did not have the kind of quarter in the fourth quarter that we had hoped they would. They had some personnel changes. And frankly, I think in the out-of-home space, there was a little bit of a pullback in general in that space, and Captivate obviously is part of that space. But we anticipate that for the full year of 2012 that we are going to see some good, solid improvement on the Captivate front.

Operator

And next, we’ll move on to John Janedis with UBS.

John Janedis – UBS Investment Bank, Research Division

Gracia, you talked about your TV outlook and, obviously, there’s some benefit from the Super Bowl. Would it be possible to talk maybe about the pacings from January to February? And then separately on CareerBuilder, I know you mentioned the global growth, revenue up 15%. Can you break out the North America-only growth? And on the December global invoicing, do you have maybe a pro forma number excluding some of those non-U.S. acquisitions you made?

Gracia C. Martore

Okay, that’s a number of questions and I hope that, Paul, you’ve jotted them all down. I think we ought to start with the TV outlook pacings. I think January got off to a little bit — is going to be a little bit less than clearly February when we have the benefit of the Super Bowl on all of our NBC affiliates. So I think pacings are up very nicely, I think, double digits in February and certainly stronger even in March. So we’re very pleased at the follow-through there. Auto has been a very strong category as it was in the fourth quarter, and it continues to have good traction in the first quarter as we go into the first quarter. So we’re very pleased with that. I think it’d be tough for us to kind of break out all of those components on CareerBuilder. But what we can tell you is that in North America, I think revenues were up in the again the low teens, that 12%, 13% range. Internationally, I think we said revenues were up 40%-plus. I’d say that obviously, excluding acquisitions, we had the Singapore acquisition. It still would’ve been a substantial double-digit increase excluding that acquisition. But I know that Jeff will calculate that number and come back to you.

John Janedis – UBS Investment Bank, Research Division

And can I squeeze in maybe one quick one also on Newsquest? I guess let’s say, I was a little bit surprised to see the outperformance there versus the U.S. print business across, I guess, pretty much all the segments. Do you still view that business as core to long-term operation?

Gracia C. Martore

I’d start by saying that I think that the management team, led by Paul Davidson at Newsquest, has done just a terrific job in dealing with a very difficult economy there. In the fourth quarter, the U.K. economy actually contracted slightly, which is a very difficult economic backdrop to have to be dealing with. But they came through in a very meaningful way. They had the benefit of very strong national revenues in the fourth quarter, in part as a result of some digital transition for TV. And so they were the beneficiary of that, as well as just a lot of initiatives that they have going on throughout the business there. So we were extremely pleased with their results in the quarter. And as always, they have a wonderful local franchise. We are very focused on local. They have a wonderful local footprint just as we do here in the States. So it’s a terrific business. But as we’ve always said about all of our businesses, if someone comes along and is looking at the businesses and offer us something that is — makes more sense from a shareholder value perspective, we will take it to the board. But the Newsquest folks have done just a terrific job in 2011 dealing with the economic environment they’ve had to deal with.

Operator

Next, we’ll hear from Jim Goss with Barrington Research.

James C. Goss – Barrington Research Associates, Inc., Research Division

A couple of questions, Gracia. One, with regard to your aspiration to be viewed as a global media and marketing solutions company, while a lot of that is U.K. right now. Is there a global opportunity you perceive for some of your digitally delivered content, for example, USA TODAY supported by global advertisers and international markets that might want a window on the U.S.? And then I have a couple of things on the broadcast side.

Gracia C. Martore

Sure. Let me — we’ll start with that question. I think in a digital world, there are no boundaries or barriers to your content and your distribution. And as you say, we have some terrific content certainly at USA TODAY. We’re already in some countries sharing that under a model in South America and in some other places sharing USA TODAY content in a licensing kind of model. So certainly, we think that there are opportunities along that front to do things. CareerBuilder clearly is an international company with operations in over 20 countries at this point. We see — we continue to see opportunities for them to expand their reach internationally and continue to see great opportunities there with the exclusive that we have on the MSN traffic overseas. So we see lots of opportunities for us to, in a digital world, expand our footprint.

James C. Goss – Barrington Research Associates, Inc., Research Division

Okay. And on the broadcast area, have you noticed a trend that you tend to track in terms of the relationship of broadcast cost and expense levels vis-à-vis the swings introduced by political and Olympic revenues? Has there been some sort of ratio you have tended to notice or anything of that nature because I think they do sort of track up and down together? And also internationally with the Olympics coming up, does your U.K. presence for the London Olympics give you any added benefit that you’d like to talk about?

Gracia C. Martore

With — let me address the first part of that question first. Dave Lougee, who runs our broadcast stations, always does a terrific job, and there are just natural factors on the expense side. When you have $47 million of incremental political spending and you have a lot of coverage, you have sales commissions and other pieces associated with that. You also have additional coverage that you clearly are doing at times and additional expenses when you’re covering political and you’re covering Olympics, particularly when it’s overseas and the like. And so in an even year, you expect to see expenses rise. I don’t think we have any particular formula other than that we obviously look, as we’re budgeting for the next year, at commissions and travel and those pieces that relate on a variable basis to those kinds of events. And then clearly in a year like 2011 when those events are missing and — those special events are missing, then we would expect expenses to reflect that. I think we have a terrific opportunity vis-à-vis the Olympics. With USA TODAY, with our 13 NBC affiliates and the fact that our Newsquest properties are on the ground there in the U.K., sharing of content resources, sharing of video resources and a variety of those kinds of factors, we believe, are going to be very helpful to us as we provide some very, very strong coverage of what we think is going to be a very interesting Olympics in London.

Operator

And next, we’ll hear from Bill Bird with Lazard.

William G. Bird – Lazard Capital Markets LLC, Research Division

It’s Bill Bird at Lazard. Two questions. One, could you talk about how you think about dividends versus buybacks? And then two, could you just talk about how Q1 publishing advertising is trending versus Q4?

Gracia C. Martore

Let me start with the capital allocation question. And then Paul, why don’t you jump in on the trending. Dividends versus buyback. There’s all the academic work that’s been done around them about the consistency of cash flow that dividends sometimes project on share repurchases. There are benefits to that. We listen to our owners and potential owners and get their feedback on it, and then we are in the process of obviously sharing all of that with our board. And we will look to providing what I think is a good balance between the 2 that makes the most sense for us again to provide flexibility for us to make investments while at the same time returning incremental cash flow to our shareholders. Paul, why don’t you…

Paul N. Saleh

Yes, Bill, first quarter publishing advertising, I think it would be probably too early to tell how the whole quarter will pan out. January was picking up where December was. We — but I would say it’s still too early to tell how the whole quarter will end.

Operator

And from Noble Financial, Michael Kupinski has the next question.

Michael A. Kupinski – Noble Financial Group, Inc., Research Division

Yes. I was kind of want to drill down a little bit more in the broadcasting area in terms of your thoughts about pacings. What — can you give us an idea of what you’re assuming for political in the quarter? I know that you kind of shied away from that in the past, but I’m just wondering if you’re just trying to be a little conservative with the guidance in Broadcasting, particularly as it relates, you mentioned, Florida. And if I recall the last cycle, you didn’t really give a lot of political in Florida because of the way that, I guess, the primaries were set up. But this time, it seems like they’re spending a lot, both candidates, Romney and Gingrich, are spending a lot of money in Florida. So I was just wondering if you can give me a little thought on that. And then also, any color on the key advertising categories that — and maybe the core advertising growth rate that you’re assuming in the first quarter?

Gracia C. Martore

Let me try to answer all of those, Mike, and Paul, please jump in to add anything. On the political front, as I mentioned, we will get more than our fair share of the political dollars that are spent — that were spent in South Carolina as well as are being spent in Florida. We are right on track. But the first quarter, even in a strong political year like 2008 or even 2010, they tend to be in the single millions of dollars. And in fact, if you look at our political spending in 2008 and 2010, what you’d see is that in the second half of the year, that’s primarily when we generate the vast majority of our spending, something like 80%-plus of all of the political we receive, we received in 2010 and 2008 is in the back half of the year. And September, October, November being the particularly large, large months. But during the course of the year, obviously, we’ll benefit from whatever happens. We have a — from a footprint perspective, we’ve got 13 U.S Senate and 3 governors races in our markets, which is about the same number as 2008, although we’re going to have to see how competitive each one of those races ultimately is. In 2010, obviously not a presidential year but there were like, I think, 16 Senate and 18 governors races in our market. But overall, I’d say, Mike, we would expect that this will be a very robust presidential year with direct spending and all the pack money we’ve all been hearing about being deployed. So we look forward to a strong year on the political front.

Michael A. Kupinski – Noble Financial Group, Inc., Research Division

Have core advertising kind of weakened, the rates weakened a little bit in the first quarter than from — it seems like it’s like pacing below in terms of the core advertising a little bit.

Gracia C. Martore

Well, I think we had indicated in the fourth quarter we saw that, I think pure time sales, excluding political, were up about 9%. In the first quarter, I think at this point, we’ve given guidance that spending would be — revenues would be up in the high-single digits. It’s incredibly early in the quarter frankly. So I think we’re right on track to achieve what we expect to achieve, but we’ll continue to update everyone as the quarter unfolds. We always tend to be careful early in the quarter and then hope to come in at the high end of expectations. As you know in the fourth quarter, we had indicated 8% to 9% and then raised that up to the 11% range. We’ll just have to see how the quarter unfolds. I will say that from a category standpoint, auto continues to be quite strong, particularly in February and March. And some other key categories like telcom and a few others are very strong. So we think that we’ll get — we’ll have a good year on the broadcasting side.

Operator

And next, we’ll hear from Leo Kulp with Citi.

Leo Kulp – Citigroup Inc, Research Division

Two quick ones. First, can you talk about your outlook for investments in the Digital segment? And then second, can you talk about the potential impact on newsprint usage from the 3-around format that you’re rolling out and what sort of impact that’s having on the increase in CapEx for next year?

Gracia C. Martore

Sure. Let me start with digital acquisition opportunities. We are always looking at opportunities to acquire capabilities or technologies in core and adjacent areas but nothing dramatic. We are disciplined investors as always, and we’ll evaluate each opportunity in the context of our strategy and as it arises. We are very pleased with some of the small acquisitions that we’ve recently done. Last week, we announced the acquisition as I mentioned of Fantasy Sports, and Big Lead Sports paid a small price to provide us with a substantial increase in our footprint. So always looking at opportunities, but we’ll continue to be quite financially disciplined. Paul, do you want to talk a little bit about newsprint and the 3-around?

Paul N. Saleh

Yes. Actually, the capital spending is relatively minimal for that. In cases where we have actually tested the format, our customers really have liked the new format. It’s very appealing. And I would say that usage obviously will be lower in a sense from a design perspective, but it also depends on some of the actions that we’re going to take in the coming quarters in terms of the new introduction of digital and print subscriber packages. And so from a usage perspective, it all depends on the ultimate subscriber base that we have.

Gracia C. Martore

Yes. And I’d add that capital spending, which was about I think $72 million this year, we have a budget that I think is in the $90 million to $95 million range. Most of what’s driven the increase in the budget and frankly, it’s a very modest increase, it relates to some of our digital activities and digital footprint. CareerBuilder, we include about 100% of their CapEx in our CapEx number. Although they fund their own CapEx, their number is up a bit. So I think it’s a variety of those things. There’s just a small impact from the new format.

Operator

And next from Benchmark, we’ll move on to Edward Atorino.

Edward J. Atorino – The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division

Got sort of 3 questions. One, can you talk a little bit about circulation? Seems to be hanging in there and your pricing strategy for 2011, and maybe you could separate out the U.S., U.K. and the domestic. Second, your payroll strategy. You have launched a few I think. What the current number is and how you see the year unfolding? And lastly, have you seen any Olympic commitments yet given the fact that, that stuff usually sells out pretty fast?

Gracia C. Martore

Let me start with the subscription strategy that we highlighted in our opening remarks. And then if, Paul, you could pull out some circulation numbers, that would be great. We obviously have been — benefited from the learnings from the first 3 tests that we mentioned to all of you in Greenville and St. George and Tallahassee. And also as we’ve indicated, we’ve done a pretty significant amount of work around consumer preferences and their thoughts around paying for content, including in-depth research actually in a number of our own specific markets. We’re not going to take a cookie-cutter approach to this as each one of our markets is somewhat different and the areas of content that readers and viewers and users are passionate about frankly vary by community. We have now just, literally just, rolled out 6 markets where we’re going to get additional feedback. So far, and literally I’m talking about in the last few days, literally, we’ve had some very encouraging feedback so far. But I think that’s a place where we’re going to have to give you additional insights in late February and then report to you each quarter on how we are progressing as we roll the markets out. But we are in agreement with Warren Buffett’s comments that our content, which is, we believe, engaging and relevant and differentiated in those local communities has value and shouldn’t be given away free. And so we are going to talk a lot about that at our meeting in February. Paul, do you want to chat about…

Edward J. Atorino – The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division

Are current subscribers going to pay for the payroll, or won’t you talk about that?

Gracia C. Martore

It will be a different kind of subscription model. It will vary market to market, but we’ll go into greater detail in February. Paul, do you want to comment on the circulation numbers and then I’ll finish up with the Olympics?

Paul N. Saleh

Yes. Circulation numbers in the quarter were better than they were in the third quarter; they were down in the less than 5%. And then, the Sunday circulation has been also a good story throughout the year for us, and it was 0% to 2%, down 0% to 2%.

Edward J. Atorino – The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division

Pricing? The pricing strategy for 2012?

Gracia C. Martore

He’s giving you — he was sort of giving you the volume.

Paul N. Saleh

I was giving you the circulation.

Gracia C. Martore

The one thing I would add to that is we’ve mentioned the importance of Sunday circulation, the fact that about 45% of our ad revenues in, for instance, U.S. Community Publishing occur on Sunday. And in the fourth quarter, I believe Bob Dickey shared with me that we had 18 of our top newspapers that had total Sunday circulation increases year-over-year. So that’s been a real area of focus for us, and that continues to pay good dividends for us and is an important part obviously of our focus on the ad model and Sunday circulation. On Olympics, we are working diligently obviously on commitments. I know that Dave Lougee has some folks just very much focused on Olympics. We’ve gotten commitments in hand from some local sponsors, regional sponsors, but he’ll be doing a lot more work in that area as the months progress. But we feel very good about our ability to generate — have a strong Olympic showing this go around on our 13 NBC affiliates.

Edward J. Atorino – The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division

Could you remind me what you did in 2008? Was it the — it’s in the — $18 million, no?

Gracia C. Martore

In 2010, it was about $18 million or $19 million. That was the winter Olympics. In 2008 which I believe was a Summer Olympics in Beijing. We think we achieved about in the low 20s on Olympic revenues. I think we have time for just one more question.

Operator

That will be Avi Steiner from JPMorgan.

Avi Steiner – JP Morgan Chase Co, Research Division

With whatever capital allocation decisions you ultimately unveil in February, will absolute debt repayment still be front of mind? Is there a particular leverage level you want to get to? And are ratings at all a consideration in your decision?

Gracia C. Martore

We are blessed with, as we said today, an enormous amount of free cash flow. Over these last 4 years despite incredible economic headwinds, we have consistently generated several hundred million dollars of free cash flow. We will be very focused on debt repayment, as well as returning capital — increased levels of capital to our shareholders. But we can do that from free cash flow, as well as continue to have an absolute debt level that will be very, very satisfactory. We always look at our ratings. We’re always mindful of that. We right now have a real fortressed balance sheet. We have our maturities well extended. So we take all of those things into consideration. But as you know, we’ve paid down a lot of debt over these last several years. Our balance sheet is in great shape, and we have the opportunity with the enormous amount of free cash flow that we generate to return additional capital to shareholders, at the same time focusing on investing in our businesses, at the same time continuing to manage our balance sheet in a very prudent way. So we’re very fortunate on all those fronts. We appreciate all of you joining us this morning. And if you have any specific questions we didn’t have a chance to answer this morning, I know that Jeff Heinz will be happy to take them. He can be reached at (703) 854-6917. Have a wonderful day.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today’s conference. Thank you for joining.